Bug#978954: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release

Right, it should certainly not be included in its current state in next release. But there is more into it. If you for instance try to install Opera from stable (or oldstable or testing or unstable...) the .deb recommends pepperflashplugin-nonfree, and you may end up to a situation like this:

Processing of tess_0.3.0-7.1_source.changes

tess_0.3.0-7.1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tess_0.3.0-7.1.dsc tess_0.3.0-7.1.diff.gz tess_0.3.0-7.1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

tess_0.3.0-7.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 14:58:26 +0100 Source: tess Architecture: source Version: 0.3.0-7.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Holger Levsen Changes: tess (0.3.0-7.1) unstable; u

Processing of tmexpand_0.1.2.0-4.1_source.changes

tmexpand_0.1.2.0-4.1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tmexpand_0.1.2.0-4.1.dsc tmexpand_0.1.2.0-4.1.debian.tar.xz tmexpand_0.1.2.0-4.1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

tmexpand_0.1.2.0-4.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 16:32:40 +0100 Source: tmexpand Architecture: source Version: 0.1.2.0-4.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Holger Levsen Changes: tmexpand (0.1.2.0-4.1)

Bug#979593: rox: FTBFS under some locales

Source: rox Severity: important Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: username ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org kilob...@angband.pl The 2.11-3 version of calls iconv from debian/rules, which fails to build under certain locales, as see

Bug#978954: pepperflashplugin-nonfree: should not be part of next stable Debian release

Another reminder about why it's important to handle this also in the supported releases: https://askubuntu.com/q/1306202 -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj

Processing of rox_2.11-4_source.changes

rox_2.11-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rox_2.11-4.dsc rox_2.11-4.debian.tar.xz rox_2.11-4_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#979593: marked as done (rox: FTBFS under some locales)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Jan 2021 03:20:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#979593: fixed in rox 1:2.11-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #979593, regarding rox: FTBFS under some locales to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

rox_2.11-4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 03:48:49 +0100 Source: rox Architecture: source Version: 1:2.11-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Adam Borowski Closes: 979593 Changes: rox (1:2.11-4)