It should be removed, indeed.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 972870 ftp.debian.org
Bug #972870 [libhal1-flash] Should libhal1-flash be shipped in bullseye?
Bug reassigned from package 'libhal1-flash' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions hal-flash/0.3.3-3.
Ignoring request to a
Source: boxbackup
Version: 0.13~~git20200326.g8e8b63c-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on arm64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201205 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on arm64 (I don't know if it also fails on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 976569 libblosc1 1.20.1+ds1-1
Bug #976569 [src:numcodecs] numcodecs: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild
--test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.8 3.9" returned exit code 13
Bug reassigned from package 'src:numcodecs' to 'libblosc1
[ Copying other bugs affected by new latex failures since my last
rebuild ]
Hi Paolo,
On 05/12/20 at 18:55 +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> Hi Lucas (is it you, or a bot?),
I'm not a bot, but only noticed this message by chance. Remember that
bug submitters do not receive emails sent to nnn...@bugs.
Hi
thanks for the digging through the errors.
> < texlive-base_2020.20200925-1
> ---
> > texlive-base_2020.20201203-2
> Also, I noticed a few new latex-related failures in this archive rebuild.
[...]
It seems that something in the interface with hyperref has changed.
Unfortunately the docbook/j
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> There was a texlive update in the meantime. Here are the versions of
> packages that differ.
I explored this a bit today -- there's something quite amiss with the
docbook toolchain. I'm seeing a lot of this error:
! Undefined control sequence.
\close@pdf
7 matches
Mail list logo
