Processed: Re: Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 922566 Bug #915721 [release.debian.org] transition: opencv 915721 was not blocked by any bugs. 915721 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 915721: 922566 > block -1 by 922569 Bug #915721 [release.debian.org] transition: opencv 915721 was bl

Bug#915602: Please upgrade to a newer snapshot/version

2019-10-10 Thread Boyuan Yang
X-Debbugs-CC: jo...@jones.dk bi...@debian.org I have played around and prepared a new packaging release in the experimental branch based on the codebase on Oct 2019: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnulib/tree/experimental The issue is that newer gnulib requires newer gettext (>= 0.20) to work,

Processing of ksh_2020.0.0-1_source.changes

2019-10-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
ksh_2020.0.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ksh_2020.0.0-1.dsc ksh_2020.0.0.orig.tar.gz ksh_2020.0.0-1.debian.tar.xz ksh_2020.0.0-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

ksh_2020.0.0-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2019-10-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:15:52 -0400 Source: ksh Architecture: source Version: 2020.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Boyuan Yang Changes: ksh (2020.0.0-1) unstable; urg

Processed: limit source to gkdebconf, tagging 925574, tagging 916419, tagging 928698

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source gkdebconf Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'gkdebconf' Limit currently set to 'source':'gkdebconf' > tags 925574 + pending Bug #925574 [gkdebconf] gkdebconf: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation -

Bug#523513: marked as done (rdate: should not set time if network delay is too big)

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:05:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#523513: fixed in rdate 1:1.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #523513, regarding rdate: should not set time if network delay is too big to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#941391: marked as done (rdate: New upstream release and homepage)

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:05:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#941391: fixed in rdate 1:1.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #941391, regarding rdate: New upstream release and homepage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#596248: marked as done (pidgin-openpgp: Starts extra gpg-agent process on activation.)

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Oct 2019 05:06:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#942152: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #596244, regarding pidgin-openpgp: Starts extra gpg-agent process on activation. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#596244: marked as done (pidgin: Starts and detaches extra gpg-agent process.)

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Oct 2019 05:06:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#942152: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #596244, regarding pidgin: Starts and detaches extra gpg-agent process. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#789407: marked as done (unable to send openpgp messages)

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Oct 2019 05:06:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#942152: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #789407, regarding unable to send openpgp messages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#767184: marked as done (pidgin-openpgp: should pass the --trust-model always to the gpg encrypt command)

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Oct 2019 05:06:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#942152: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #767184, regarding pidgin-openpgp: should pass the --trust-model always to the gpg encrypt command to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#764962: marked as done ([pidgin-openpgp] Should be replaced with pidgin-gpg)

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Oct 2019 05:06:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#942152: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #764962, regarding [pidgin-openpgp] Should be replaced with pidgin-gpg to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#912890: marked as done (pidgin-openpgp: Depends on libgtk2-perl, that won't be part of Bullseye)

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 11 Oct 2019 05:06:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#942152: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #912890, regarding pidgin-openpgp: Depends on libgtk2-perl, that won't be part of Bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#942152: Removed package(s) from unstable

2019-10-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 0.1-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package pidgin-openpgp has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/942152

Bug#942152: Removed package(s) from unstable

2019-10-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: pidgin-openpgp | 0.1-2 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; NIT; orphaned; RC-buggy -- Note that the package