moon-lander_1.0-6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
moon-lander_1.0-6.dsc
moon-lander_1.0-6.debian.tar.xz
moon-lander_1.0-6_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 07:57:17 +0200
Source: moon-lander
Binary: moon-lander moon-lander-data
Architecture: source
Version: 1:1.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Adam Borowsk
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2017 07:52:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#878090: fixed in xchain 1.0.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #878090,
regarding xchain: Couldn't execute /usr/bin/wish
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
xchain_1.0.1-8_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xchain_1.0.1-8.dsc
xchain_1.0.1-8.debian.tar.xz
xchain_1.0.1-8_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:14:07 +0200
Source: xchain
Binary: xchain
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.1-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Adam Borowski
Description:
xchain
After updating xchain to 1.0.1-8 in unstable, I cannot run it - it says
"Couldn't execute /usr/bin/wish8.5"
- Before the update it worked just fine.
I believe this is because I had the wish which is provided by the tk
package wish provide a /usr/bin/wish, and xchain is depending
on either tk8.5
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #878090 {Done: Adam Borowski } [xchain] xchain:
Couldn't execute /usr/bin/wish
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked a
Control: reopen -1
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 06:58:04PM +0200, Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
> After updating xchain to 1.0.1-8 in unstable, I cannot run it - it says
>
> "Couldn't execute /usr/bin/wish8.5"
>
> - Before the update it worked just fine.
>
> I believe this is because I had the wish whic
xchain_1.0.1-9_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xchain_1.0.1-9.dsc
xchain_1.0.1-9.debian.tar.xz
xchain_1.0.1-9_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2017 18:48:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#878090: fixed in xchain 1.0.1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #878090,
regarding xchain: Couldn't execute /usr/bin/wish
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 20:12:24 +0200
Source: xchain
Binary: xchain
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.1-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Adam Borowski
Description:
xchain
gnome-mime-data_2.18.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gnome-mime-data_2.18.0-2.dsc
gnome-mime-data_2.18.0-2.diff.gz
gnome-mime-data_2.18.0-2_all.deb
gnome-mime-data_2.18.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on h
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 22:38:08 +0200
Source: gnome-mime-data
Binary: gnome-mime-data
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.18.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Manuel A. Fernan
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org sebast...@breakpoint.cc
在 2017年10月12日星期四 CST 下午11:44:37，Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 写道：
> Hi,
>
> this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
> remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
> of this bug to serious
Source: dnprogs
Version: 2.65
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
dnprogs fails to cross build from source for many reasons. The packaging
runs plain make without passing any cross toolchain, so it ends up using
the build architecture toolchain. Indirecting that through dh_a
26 matches
Mail list logo
