Processed: Re: FTBFS with GCC 6: cannot convert x to y

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #811656 [starvoyager] FTBFS with GCC 6: cannot convert x to y Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 811656: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811656 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem

Bug#811656: FTBFS with GCC 6: cannot convert x to y

Control: severity -1 serious > I don't know how to fix this, so I just made a QA upload that makes > the package to use GCC 5. This should make the bug not to be RC for > stretch. no, gcc-5 is targeted for removal for stretch.

Processing of yowsup_2.4.103-2_source.changes

yowsup_2.4.103-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: yowsup_2.4.103-2.dsc yowsup_2.4.103-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

yowsup_2.4.103-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 14:31:24 -0300 Source: yowsup Binary: python-yowsup yowsup-cli Architecture: source Version: 2.4.103-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Fi

Bug#833610: ara: please make the build reproducible

Source: ara Version: 1.0.31 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that ara could not be built reproducib

Bug#486339: marked as done (starvoyager: Missing library libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3)

Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2016 01:30:09 +0200 (CEST) with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#486339: Info received (starvoyager: Missing library debian.org) libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3) has caused the Debian Bug report #486339, regarding starvoyager: Missing library libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 to

Bug#555279: marked as done (starvoyager: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)?)

Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2016 01:34:30 +0200 (CEST) with message-id and subject line Re: starvoyager: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)? has caused the Debian Bug report #555279, regarding starvoyager: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)? to be marked as done. This means

mrxvt is marked for autoremoval from testing

mrxvt 0.5.4-1.2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-08-21 It is affected by these RC bugs: 822003: mrxvt: Build arch:all+arch:any but is missing build-{arch,indep} targets