Control: severity -1 critical
On 2016-06-26 10:51:12 +0900, Sean Whitton wrote:
> The description for the 'serious' severity is
>
> is a severe violation of Debian policy (that is, the problem is a
> violation of a 'must' or 'required' directive); may or may not
> affect the usability
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 critical
Bug #128745 [libstroke0-dev] libstroke0-dev: aclocal is confused by libstroke
.m4 files
Bug #302907 [libstroke0-dev] Need more quoting of autoconf macro files.
Severity set to 'critical' from 'important'
Severity set to 'critical' from 'importa
Source: anon-proxy
Version: 00.05.38+20081230-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828229 808669 828232 809271 828228 828142 828127 828230
822380 814600 828139 828233 827068 828082 828231 828083
827061 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of
Source: boxbackup
Version: 0.11.1~r2837-2
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828242 828237 809271 814600 828127 828230 828251 828082
828231 828246 828229 828232 827068 828083 828249 828239 828240 828250 828248
828235 828245 828139 828252 828247 82
Source: burp
Version: 1.3.48-4.1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828083 828139 828252 828247 828246 828239 828234 814600
828245 828230 828253 828127 828254 828082 828228 828248 822380 828142 828241
828237 828242 827068 828236 828235 82
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828270 828273 828277 828258 828233 828285 828246 828262
828254 828278 828264 828236 828248 828238 828259 828228 828142 828244 828279
828241 828139 828290 808669 828242 82
Source: ekg
Version: 1.9~pre+r2855-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attem
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828236 828230 828255 828273 828274 809271 828264 828249
828286 828272 828259 828239 828235 828139 828281 828248 828247 828289 828250
828083 828288 808669 828277 822380 82
Source: ekg2
Version: 0.4~pre+20120506.1-12
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-2
Source: httperf
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828264 828241 828292 828247 828306 828288 828290 822380
828267 828248 828329 828246 828311 828293 828303 828296 828321 828315 828302
828327 828239 828274 828336 828263 82
Source: mod-authn-webid
Version: 0~20110301-4
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828381 828374 828278 828338 828413 828355 828261 828307
828431 828289 828280 828358 828423 828315 828400 828416 828260 828394 828433
828249 828299 828414 828366 828337 82
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828254 828273 828459 828428 828402 828457 828431 828262
828082 828360 828374 828396 828274 828453 828415 828255 828389 828286 828266
828447 828434 828393 828450 828283 82
Source: opencryptoki
Version: 3.4.1+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29
Source: partimage
Version: 0.6.8-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempt
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828308 828139 828253 828239 828363 828355 828309 828240
828450 828319 828297 828248 828305 828328 828414 828340 828458 828298 828465
828386 828243 828237 828429 828366 82
Source: sendmail
Version: 8.15.2-4
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempt
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828453 828515 828421 828297 828261 828378 828273 828274
828343 828390 828278 828420 828435 828364 828415 828383 828456 828279 828514
828281 828230 828331 828373 828492 82
Source: samdump2
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempte
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828332 828412 828456 828494 828481 828265 828454 828463
828429 828243 828306 828419 828415 828351 828255 828082 828352 828420 828250
828505 828369 828390 828443 828319 82
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828573 828533 828307 828406 828483 828493 808669 828378
828374 828252 828355 828548 828328 828297 828534 828425 828470 828539 828508
828359 828234 828259 828254 828232 82
Source: turnserver
Version: 0.7.3-4
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attemp
Source: virtuoso-opensource
Version: 6.1.6+dfsg2-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-20
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828462 828142 828592 828248 828447 828385 828317 828528
828250 828274 828398 828451 828400 828487 828399 828490 828228 828389 828416
828272 828544 828371 828355 828310 82
Source: wvstreams
Version: 4.6.1-8
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempt
Processing control commands:
> block 827061 by -1
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828453 828515 828346 828593 828283 828594 828295 828520
828423 828365 828577 828253 828473 828341 828524 814600 828323 828420 828413
828246 828298 828466 828332 828440 82
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:09:51 -0800 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: blackbox
> Version: 0.70.1-30
> Severity: important
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-symbols
>
> This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released
> yet, but it's expecte
blackbox_0.70.1-31_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
blackbox_0.70.1-31.dsc
blackbox_0.70.1-31.debian.tar.xz
blackbox-dbgsym_0.70.1-31_amd64.deb
blackbox_0.70.1-31_amd64.deb
libbt-dev_0.70.1-31_amd64.deb
libbt0v5-dbgsym_0.70.1-31_amd64.deb
libbt0v5
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:49:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#811970: fixed in blackbox 0.70.1-31
has caused the Debian Bug report #811970,
regarding blackbox: FTBFS with GCC 6: symbol changes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:11:31 -0300
Source: blackbox
Binary: blackbox libbt-dev libbt0v5
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.70.1-31
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Herb
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#697109: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #697109,
regarding adduser: [INTL:ja] updated Japanese program translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#676356: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #676356,
regarding [INTL:tr] Turkish debconf templates translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#547911: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #547911,
regarding adduser: option --add_extra_groups not mentioned in --help overview,
but mentioned in manpage
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#611898: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #611898,
regarding adduser: manpage mentions nonexistent possibility to run custom
scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#695997: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #695997,
regarding adduser: Minor error in Norwegian Bokmål debconf translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#685529: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #685529,
regarding adduser: translation error in german manpage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#698483: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #698483,
regarding Error in German adduser manpage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#508740: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #508740,
regarding adduser: confusing message regarding format of group names
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#712944: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #712944,
regarding Please update the examples directory with adduser.local v4.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825734: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #825734,
regarding [l10n] Updated Czech translation of adduser
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825610: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #825610,
regarding Updated Vietnamese translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#776203: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #776203,
regarding Please extend LAST_UID 2 to 5.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#722583: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #722583,
regarding delgroup --only-if-empty is undocumented in manpage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825777: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #825777,
regarding [INTL:da] Danish translation adduser manual
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#756180: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #756180,
regarding adduser: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation of manpage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825770: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #825770,
regarding adduser: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#826965: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #826965,
regarding adduser: [INTL:pt_BR] Brazilian Portuguese translation for runtime
messages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825778: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #825778,
regarding [INTL:da] Danish translation of the template adduser
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825944: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #825944,
regarding adduser: [INTL:ru] Russian documentation translation update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825876: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #825876,
regarding adduser: [INTL:ru] Russian program translation update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825867: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #825867,
regarding adduser: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation - program and
manpage
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#825973: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #825973,
regarding adduser: [l10n] update Japanese translation of program
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#826947: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #826947,
regarding [INTL:sv] Swedish strings for adduser debconf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#827011: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #827011,
regarding adduser: [INTL:it] Italian program strings translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#827140: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #827140,
regarding adduser: French translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Sun, 26 Jun 2016 22:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#827012: fixed in adduser 3.115
has caused the Debian Bug report #827012,
regarding adduser: [INTL:it] Italian manpages translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
python-ofxhome_0.3.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-ofxhome_0.3.3-1.dsc
python-ofxhome_0.3.3.orig.tar.gz
python-ofxhome_0.3.3-1.debian.tar.xz
python-ofxhome_0.3.3-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck
python-ofxclient_2.0.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-ofxclient_2.0.2-1.dsc
python-ofxclient_2.0.2.orig.tar.gz
python-ofxclient_2.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz
python-ofxclient_2.0.2-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on h
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:08:48 +0200
Source: python-ofxclient
Binary: python-ofxclient
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Clint Adams
De
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:01:05 +0200
Source: python-ofxhome
Binary: python-ofxhome
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Clint Adams
Descri
64 matches
Mail list logo
