Bug#717536: current status

2015-06-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:19:57 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I see this bug tagged as pending. ... please explain the fix. Looks like you missed the explanation provided in the tag pending: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=9;bug=717536 # Source package in NEW: http://packages.

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/19/2015 01:37 PM, James Cowgill wrote: > From the bug: >> RC severity mostly so this shows up on the radars of all the >> right people crossing off the details we need to finalise for the >> release. > > That doesn't apply here. stretch will

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Stephan Jauernick
Hi, I will post the important part of one of my previous mails again: Is there a chance that you got slp installed? If yes. please try to remove it. On Jessie libslp gets pulled in automatically. I can't reproduce the bug on a fresh debian wheezy VM. And neither on a fresh debian jessie VM. Ple

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Stephan, seriously, you are missing the point. Absolutely _no_one_ needs ROAR audio with DECnet support except you and your buddy Patrick. If you desperately need ROAR audio in cmus, then you can rebuild it manually. Debian should not keep packages

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/20/2015 12:23 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote: > Is there a chance that you got slp installed? If yes. please try > to remove it. On Jessie libslp gets pulled in automatically. Oh, and btw, removing essential packages like OpenSLP is _not_ an opti

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/20/2015 12:23 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote: > Is there a chance that you got slp installed? If yes. please try > to remove it. On Jessie libslp gets pulled in automatically. Btw, how did you remove libslp1 without removing libroar2? glaubitz@i

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 20.06.2015 um 12:42 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > Stephan, > > seriously, you are missing the point. Absolutely _no_one_ needs ROAR > audio with DECnet support except you and your buddy Patrick. I need roaraudio for myself? He is my buddy? I don't know him at all :o John: please stop wr

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/20/2015 12:52 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > I need roaraudio for myself? He is my buddy? I don't know him at > all :o John: please stop writing e-mails like this.. It's Adrian, not John, and I am just quoting Ron who certainly isn't making this

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Stephan Jauernick
Hi Adrian, On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:47:57PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/20/2015 12:23 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote: > > Is there a chance that you got slp installed? If yes. please try > > to remove it. On Jessie libslp gets pulled in automatically. > > Btw, how did you remov

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Stephan Jauernick
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 12:42:57PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi Adrian, Could you please make a bug against roaraudio asking to drop the libdnet dependency? > Stephan, > > seriously, you are missing the point. Absolutely _no_one_ needs ROAR > audio with DECnet support except you an

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 20.06.2015 um 13:02 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > On 06/20/2015 12:52 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> I need roaraudio for myself? He is my buddy? I don't know him at >> all :o John: please stop writing e-mails like this.. > > It's Adrian, not John, and I am just quoting Ron who certainly

Bug#789407: unable to send openpgp messages

2015-06-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
package: pidgin-openpgp version: 0.1-2 severity: grave I can only receive openpgp messages, sending does not work. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Ron
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:02:50PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/20/2015 12:52 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > > I need roaraudio for myself? He is my buddy? I don't know him at > > all :o John: please stop writing e-mails like this.. > > It's Adrian, not John, and I am just quoting

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 20.06.2015 um 18:45 schrieb Ron: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 01:02:50PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> On 06/20/2015 12:52 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >>> I need roaraudio for myself? He is my buddy? I don't know him at >>> all :o John: please stop writing e-mails like this.. >> >> It's

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/20/2015 06:56 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> I can't say what's right or best for cmus, but what is right for >> Debian seems fairly self evident to everyone but the roar >> maintainers. > > There is no depenedencie of *roar* to dnet at all.

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/20/2015 01:03 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote: > Thanks for pointing that out. I was mistaken there. Sorry :( No worries, I don't think we disagree about the problem in general. > Can you maybe still provide a backtrace/strace log? This isn't re

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/20/2015 01:06 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote: > Could you please make a bug against roaraudio asking to drop the > libdnet dependency? There are already three of such bug reports: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755934 > htt

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/20/2015 01:12 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> It's definitely the Debian way when a certain package >> functionality that maybe a handful people need breaks other >> packages. Then it's your duty as a good Debian maintainer to get >> rid of the o

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2015-06-20 12:34:25) > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 06/20/2015 01:03 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote: > > Thanks for pointing that out. I was mistaken there. Sorry :( > > No worries, I don't think we disagree about the problem in general.

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/20/2015 07:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> I can't imagine that you cannot reproduce this on a clean >> install, I could reproduce it on all machines running at least >> Jessie. > > Please provide the command to reproduce _without_ --with-su

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 20.06.2015 um 19:28 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > On 06/20/2015 06:56 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >>> I can't say what's right or best for cmus, but what is right for >>> Debian seems fairly self evident to everyone but the roar >>> maintainers. > >> There is no depenedencie of *roar* to

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 20.06.2015 um 19:51 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: ld the release back because of such ancient >>> software? > >> OK, so lets drop iceweasel? This is definitly offtopic here > > No, we dropped sparc as a release architecture as a result > in case you missed that. Because of roaraudio? Oh

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2015-06-20 13:00:53) > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 06/20/2015 07:56 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> I can't imagine that you cannot reproduce this on a clean >>> install, I could reproduce it on all machines running at least >>> Jessi

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/20/2015 08:25 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> glaubitz@ikarus:~$ apt-cache depends cmus | grep libroar2 >> Recommends: libroar2 glaubitz@ikarus:~$ > > I agree that cmus pulls in libroar2. Why is that dangerous? Because libroar _depends_ on l

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Am 20.06.2015 um 19:51 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > ld the release back because of such ancient > >>> software? > > > >> OK, so lets drop iceweasel? This is definitly offtopic here > > > > No, we dropped sparc as a release architecture as a re

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Stephan Jauernick
Hi Adrian, On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 07:34:25PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/20/2015 01:03 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote: > > Thanks for pointing that out. I was mistaken there. Sorry :( > > No worries, I don't think we disagree about the problem in general. > > > Can you maybe st

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/20/2015 09:52 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote: > Please do for the reasons mentioned below. Also these are > considered standard of a good bug report. No, the problem is apparent and I don't really want to debug libdnet. You are still trying to b

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Stephan Jauernick
Hi Adrian, On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:16:28PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 06/20/2015 09:52 PM, Stephan Jauernick wrote: > > Please do for the reasons mentioned below. Also these are > > considered standard of a good bug report. > > No, the problem is apparent and I don't really w

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Don Armstrong (2015-06-20 14:38:25) > There's clearly a bug here, but even after reading this bug log, I've > had to do research on my own to determine what that issue is. > > If the libroar2 maintainers which to keep decnet support, then someone > should probably figure out how to circu

Re: Bug#789256: cmus: Pulls in unwanted and potentially dangerous DECnet packages through libroar2

2015-06-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2015-06-20 15:16:28) > You are still trying to boil this down to the mere problem with cmus, This bugreport is filed against cmus, is it not? > but that's just a side effect. The real point is that roaraudio > depends on an unmaintained piece of core software

Bug#788970: marked as done (abiword: please adapt for libwps 0.4)

2015-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jun 2015 06:19:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#788970: fixed in abiword 3.0.0-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #788970, regarding abiword: please adapt for libwps 0.4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Processing of abiword_3.0.1-3_amd64.changes

2015-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
abiword_3.0.1-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: abiword_3.0.1-3.dsc abiword_3.0.1-3.debian.tar.xz abiword-common_3.0.1-3_all.deb abiword-dbg_3.0.1-3_amd64.deb abiword-plugin-grammar_3.0.1-3_amd64.deb abiword-plugin-mathview_3.0.1-3_amd64.deb abiw

Processing of abiword_3.0.0-9_amd64.changes

2015-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
abiword_3.0.0-9_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: abiword_3.0.0-9.dsc abiword_3.0.0-9.debian.tar.xz abiword-common_3.0.0-9_all.deb abiword-dbg_3.0.0-9_amd64.deb abiword-plugin-grammar_3.0.0-9_amd64.deb abiword-plugin-mathview_3.0.0-9_amd64.deb abiw

abiword_3.0.1-3_amd64.changes is NEW

2015-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:gir1.2-abiword-3.0 is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to t

abiword_3.0.0-9_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-06-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:11:12 +0200 Source: abiword Binary: abiword-common abiword abiword-plugin-grammar abiword-plugin-mathview libabiword-3.0 libabiword-3.0-dev abiword-dbg Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 3.0.0-9

Processed: Bug#788970 tagged as pending

2015-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 788970 pending Bug #788970 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:abiword] abiword: please adapt for libwps 0.4 Added tag(s) pending. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 788970: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b