Processed: your mail

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 387555 confirmed fixed Bug #387555 [lynx-cur] lynx-cur: produces staircased tables Added tag(s) confirmed and fixed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 387555: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#365827: marked as done ("apt-get dist-upgrade" reinstalls lynx_2.8.5-2sarge1_amd64.deb on every call)

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 6 Mar 2015 09:34:33 +0100 with message-id <20150306083431.GA7388@emachines> and subject line "apt-get dist-upgrade" reinstalls lynx_2.8.5-2sarge1_amd64.deb on every call has caused the Debian Bug report #365827, regarding "apt-get dist-upgrade" reinstalls lynx_2.8.5-2sarge1

Processed: your mail

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 387555 pending Bug #387555 [lynx-cur] lynx-cur: produces staircased tables Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 387555: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=38755

Bug#77909: marked as done (lynx: problem with WinRoute Pro proxy)

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:24:47 +0100 with message-id <20150306092445.GA12674@emachines> and subject line lynx: problem with WinRoute Pro proxy has caused the Debian Bug report #77909, regarding lynx: problem with WinRoute Pro proxy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#277848: marked as done (lynx's p)rint option 2)mail the file, NO LONGER works)

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:31:33 +0100 with message-id <20150306093131.GA13026@emachines> and subject line #277848 lynx's p)rint option 2)mail the file, NO LONGER works has caused the Debian Bug report #277848, regarding lynx's p)rint option 2)mail the file, NO LONGER works to be mark

Bug#712738: lynx-cur: segfault after adding KEYMAP lines

2015-03-06 Thread Denis Briand
Hello, I have the same behaviour of Atsuhito. Is the crash fixed with the right syntax? Regards Denis Briand signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: your mail

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 74358 pending Bug #74358 [lynx] lynx: novice info wrong [delete key usage] Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 74358: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=74358 D

Processed: your mail

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 344598 wishlist Bug #344598 [lynx] lynx: Doesn't follow page navigation links in multipage display of lists.debian.org Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Processed: add patch

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #778009 [src:mknbi] mknbi: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) patch. -- 778009: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778009 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-pac

Processed: tagging 777257, found 619370 in 0.1.8

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 777257 + pending Bug #777257 [src:r8168] Contains non-free firmware Added tag(s) pending. > found 619370 0.1.8 Bug #619370 [apt-p2p] apt-p2p: fails to purge - command (deluser|adduser) in postrm not found Marked as found in versions apt-p2p/

Bug#778009: add patch

2015-03-06 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: tags -1 + patch patch at http://launchpadlibrarian.net/199536198/mknbi_1.4.4-10_1.4.4-10ubuntu1.diff.gz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.or

Bug#769472: marked as done (mopd: Please switch from libelfg0 to libelf1)

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:31:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#750667: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #769472, regarding mopd: Please switch from libelfg0 to libelf1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#659962: marked as done (mopd: [INTL:nl] Dutch translation of debconf templates)

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:31:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#750667: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #659962, regarding mopd: [INTL:nl] Dutch translation of debconf templates to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#737567: marked as done (mopd: Fails to handle Elf32 image: NetBSD 6.1.3 vax)

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:31:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#750667: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #737567, regarding mopd: Fails to handle Elf32 image: NetBSD 6.1.3 vax to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#98807: marked as done (mopd uses obsolete (PF_INET,SOCK_PACKET))

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:31:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#750667: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #98807, regarding mopd uses obsolete (PF_INET,SOCK_PACKET) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#749425: marked as done (mopd: Conflicting declarations of function pfWrite)

2015-03-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:31:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#750667: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #749425, regarding mopd: Conflicting declarations of function pfWrite to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#750667: Removed package(s) from unstable

2015-03-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: mopd | 1:2.5.3-22 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc --- Reason --- No user, orphaned, outdated

Bug#750667: Removed package(s) from unstable

2015-03-06 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 1:2.5.3-22+rm Dear submitter, as the package mopd has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/750667 The v