Processed: unarchiving 752809, found 752809 in 4.10.2-1, closing 752809, unarchiving 728610 ..., closing 728610 ...

2014-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 752809 Bug #752809 {Done: Damyan Ivanov } [src:qt4-perl] qt4-perl: hardcodes /usr/lib/perl5 Unarchived Bug 752809 > found 752809 4.10.2-1 Bug #752809 {Done: Damyan Ivanov } [src:qt4-perl] qt4-perl: hardcodes /usr/lib/perl5 Marked as fo

Bug#764992: dosfstools: successive runs of fsck -yvV show same error

2014-11-09 Thread AlexisM
Package: dosfstools Version: 3.0.26-4 Followup-For: Bug #764992 This bug seems to be caused by uninitialised dir entry fields for the root directory. Valgrind shows 2 errors about "conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value" Initialising the dir entry structure when constructing the

Processed: Re: dosfstools: successive runs of fsck -yvV show same error

2014-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 764992 + patch Bug #764992 [dosfstools] dosfstools: successive runs of fsck -yvV show same error Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 764992: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#764992: dosfstools: successive runs of fsck -yvV show same error

2014-11-09 Thread AlexisM
tags 764992 + patch thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/545f88b1.5030...@gmail.com

Processed: Re: dosfstools: successive runs of fsck -yvV show same error

2014-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 764992 + upstream Bug #764992 [dosfstools] dosfstools: successive runs of fsck -yvV show same error Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 764992: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Processed: Re: jarisplayer: FTBFS in jessie: build-dependency not installable: haxe

2014-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 768738 by 736596 Bug #768738 [src:jarisplayer] jarisplayer: FTBFS in jessie: build-dependency not installable: haxe 768738 was not blocked by any bugs. 768738 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 768738: 736596 > thanks Stopp

Processed: merge dosfstools bugs

2014-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 766444 normal Bug #766444 [dosfstools] fsck.vfat catches a problem made by mkfs.vfat but fails Severity set to 'normal' from 'wishlist' > merge 764992 766444 Bug #764992 [dosfstools] dosfstools: successive runs of fsck -yvV show same err

Bug#484205: doesn't seem to be worth inclusion to me

2014-11-09 Thread Adam Borowski
Meow! It looks like hovercar does nothing but add "lol" at ends of sentences. That's... not very lulzworthy. I'd vote against including it in 'filters'. -- // If you believe in so-called "intellectual property", please immediately // cease using counterfeit alphabets. Instead, contact the neare

Bug#634685: let's axe fanboy

2014-11-09 Thread Adam Borowski
Meow! What "fanboy" does is removing everything except a handful words (and format them, preserving > markers). The joke is lost on anyone who doesn't read the source, and even then it's, well, not matching my sense of humor. Even on a long text relevant to Unix development like "man bash", the w

Bug#508003: most filters break UTF-8

2014-11-09 Thread Adam Borowski
Meow! Actually, most filters break UTF-8. As I say any software that can't handle Unicode should have no place in Debian, this is not tolerable especially in a package as vital as "filters". Francois, as you snatched "filters" first[1], can you fix them yourself, or should I help with patches?

Bug#768909: dosfstools: fatlabel clobbers existing entry in root directory

2014-11-09 Thread Andreas Bombe
Package: dosfstools Version: 3.0.26-4 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: causes non-serious data loss I found this bug reported against the same version of the package in Fedora reported by user ghborrmann and reproduced it. Original report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=