Version: 1.0-12+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package tslib has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/751768
The vers
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
libts-0.0-0 | 1.0-12 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel,
powerpc, ppc64el, s390x, sparc
libts-0.0-0-dbg | 1.0-12 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel,
po
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
anubis | 4.1.1+dfsg1-4 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386,
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x, sparc
--- Reason --
Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-4+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package anubis has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/765517
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #624043,
regarding anubis: Uses deprecated _set_priority GnuTLS functions
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #643975,
regarding anubis: compiled without GPG support on some architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #661030,
regarding anubis: Use packaging format 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #727318,
regarding anubis: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and
{libtool,aclocal}.m4
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #681615,
regarding apt output error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #727318,
regarding anubis: run dh-autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and
{libtool,aclocal}.m4
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #728917,
regarding anubis: PAM config not working anymore with Wheezy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #745989,
regarding anubis: please migrate to guile-2.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #749439,
regarding anubis: Multiple and conflicting definitions of function error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:38:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#765517: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753371,
regarding misconfigure pam rules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:32:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751768: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #678144,
regarding wrong ABS_PRESSURE test in input_raw / tslib to old
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Se désinscrire de la liste:
http://link.email.wib.me/u/443/3d177fb97c135049c174fd34116f5a5f28cf5a1abf07aabc
Rue Molière, Casablanca, 2, Maroc
It looks like this might be possible now.
$ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org dak rm -Rn emacs23
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
emacs23 | 23.4+1-4.1 | source
emacs23 | 23.4+1-4.1+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, kfreebsd-amd64,
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x,
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:52:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#760954: fixed in robocode 1.6.2+dfsg2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #760954,
regarding robocode: depends on obsolete Java 6 JRE
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:52:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#738018: fixed in robocode 1.6.2+dfsg2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #738018,
regarding robocode: please provide a menu file and icons
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 19:52:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#766068: fixed in robocode 1.6.2+dfsg2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #766068,
regarding robocode: fails to start because of obsolete Java environment
detection
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
20 matches
Mail list logo
