Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:44:11 +0100
with message-id <20140119114411.ga3...@downhill.g.la>
and subject line Re: Bug#736026: please build-depend on libtiff-dev, not
libtiff4-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #736026,
regarding please build-depend on libtiff-dev, not libtiff4-dev
to
shhopt_1.1.7-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
shhopt_1.1.7-3.dsc
shhopt_1.1.7-3.debian.tar.xz
libshhopt1-dev_1.1.7-3_amd64.deb
libshhopt1_1.1.7-3_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSU
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 12:15:59 +0100
Source: shhopt
Binary: libshhopt1-dev libshhopt1
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.1.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca
Des
audit_2.3.3-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
audit_2.3.3-2.dsc
audit_2.3.3-2.debian.tar.xz
auditd_2.3.3-2_amd64.deb
libauparse0_2.3.3-2_amd64.deb
libauparse-dev_2.3.3-2_amd64.deb
libaudit1_2.3.3-2_amd64.deb
libaudit-common_2.3.3-2_all.deb
liba
Your message dated Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:03:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#735944: fixed in audit 1:2.3.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #735944,
regarding audit-support for hppa/parisc architecture
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
shhmsg_1.4.1-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
shhmsg_1.4.1-5.dsc
shhmsg_1.4.1-5.debian.tar.xz
libshhmsg1-dev_1.4.1-5_amd64.deb
libshhmsg1_1.4.1-5_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSU
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:41:04 +0100
Source: shhmsg
Binary: libshhmsg1-dev libshhmsg1
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.4.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca
Des
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 13:25:25 +0100
Source: audit
Binary: auditd libauparse0 libauparse-dev libaudit1 libaudit-common
libaudit-dev python-audit audispd-plugins
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1:2.3.3-2
Distribution
doc-central_1.8.3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
doc-central_1.8.3.dsc
doc-central_1.8.3.tar.xz
doc-central_1.8.3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 16:31:49 +0100
Source: doc-central
Binary: doc-central
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca
Description:
d
dmraid_1.0.0.rc16-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dmraid_1.0.0.rc16-5.dsc
dmraid_1.0.0.rc16-5.diff.gz
dmraid_1.0.0.rc16-5_amd64.deb
dmraid-udeb_1.0.0.rc16-5_amd64.udeb
libdmraid1.0.0.rc16-udeb_1.0.0.rc16-5_amd64.udeb
libdmraid1.0.0.rc16_1.0.0.rc1
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 17:59:25 +0100
Source: dmraid
Binary: dmraid dmraid-udeb libdmraid1.0.0.rc16-udeb libdmraid1.0.0.rc16
libdmraid-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.0.0.rc16-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Ma
Package: auditd
Version: 1:1.7.18-1.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this acti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ralf,
On 01/19/2014 02:06 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the audit package:
>
> #735944: audit-support for hppa/parisc architecture
>
> It has been clo
wmifinfo_0.09-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
wmifinfo_0.09-6.dsc
wmifinfo_0.09-6.diff.gz
wmifinfo_0.09-6_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 19:28:17 +0100
Source: wmifinfo
Binary: wmifinfo
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.09-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group
Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca
Description:
wmif
Recently I've been fixing some non-trivial problems I introduced in
emacsen-common 2.0.0 -- and to finish fixing them it looks like it may
be best to change (and augment) some of the add-on package requirements.
Originally, I'd really tried to make it so that as of emacsen-common
2.*, add-on pack
On 20.01.2014 01:46, Scott Howard wrote:
>
> Before uploading that patch and closing this bug, I'd like to look at
> "long is 32 bit on 32 bit arches. it needs to be int64_t or long long.
> This occurs several times in the file." LibTIFF4/tiffconf.h is
> generated at build time, so it should be OK
On 20.01.2014 01:46, Scott Howard wrote:
>
> Checking over the package, I don't think it's a problem of not
> updating the patch. The previous version of the package and patches
> didn't touch anything related to TIFF and used freeimage's included
> libtiff. The current version also doesn't touche
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> I disagree, all three issues found do seem like independent issues with
> little relation (on amd64 at least).
Ok, so there are three bugs:
1)
> the exif tag truncation is very unlikely cause the complete data
> structure corruption.
Ah, S
--
Stephane Crivisier
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Rob Browning
wrote:
> Recently I've been fixing some non-trivial problems I introduced in
> emacsen-common 2.0.0 -- and to finish fixing them it looks like it may
> be best to change (and augment) some of the add-on package requirements.
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
