Processed: found 719203 in 1.24-3

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 719203 1.24-3 Bug #719203 [chrony] chrony: CVE-2012-4502 and CVE-2012-4503 Marked as found in versions chrony/1.24-3. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 719203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Processed: fixed 719203 in 1.24-3.1+deb7u2

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 719203 1.24-3.1+deb7u2 Bug #719203 [chrony] chrony: CVE-2012-4502 and CVE-2012-4503 Marked as fixed in versions chrony/1.24-3.1+deb7u2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 719203: http://bugs.deb

Bug#442835: marked as done (please support editing recurring events)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #442835, regarding please support editing recurring events to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#511078: marked as done (please add support for remote calendars)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #511078, regarding please add support for remote calendars to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#473664: marked as done ([wishlist] Please add feature for copying events)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #473664, regarding [wishlist] Please add feature for copying events to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#440061: marked as done (dates: Dates lacks notion of all-day events)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #440061, regarding dates: Dates lacks notion of all-day events to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#444849: marked as done (dates: doesn't notify the user of read-only calendars)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #444849, regarding dates: doesn't notify the user of read-only calendars to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#565357: marked as done (Include a menu file for dates)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #565357, regarding Include a menu file for dates to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#720717: marked as done (dates: FTBFS with make 3.82 from experimental: missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?))

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #720717, regarding dates: FTBFS with make 3.82 from experimental: missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?) to be marke

Bug#722027: marked as done (dates: FTBFS agains evolution-data-server 3.8)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #722027, regarding dates: FTBFS agains evolution-data-server 3.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#611345: marked as done (contacts: photos are too small on 480x640 display with DPI of 285)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #611345, regarding contacts: photos are too small on 480x640 display with DPI of 285 to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#722025: marked as done (contacts: FTBFS agains evolution-data-server 3.8)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #722025, regarding contacts: FTBFS agains evolution-data-server 3.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#720697: marked as done (contacts: FTBFS with make 3.82 from experimental: missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?))

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #720697, regarding contacts: FTBFS with make 3.82 from experimental: missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?) to be ma

Bug#493537: marked as done (contacts: Fields in the address of a contact are misplaced when you try to edit it.)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #493537, regarding contacts: Fields in the address of a contact are misplaced when you try to edit it. to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#440753: marked as done (Export contacts)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #440753, regarding Export contacts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#440752: marked as done (contacts: Search by phone number (or another) field)

2013-09-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 21:25:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #440752, regarding contacts: Search by phone number (or another) field to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable

2013-09-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 0.4.8-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package dates has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723921 The vers

Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable

2013-09-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 0.9-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package contacts has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/723920 The ver

Bug#723921: Removed package(s) from unstable

2013-09-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: dates |0.4.8-3 | source dates | 0.4.8-3+b1 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc dates | 0.4.8-3+b2

Bug#723920: Removed package(s) from unstable

2013-09-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: contacts | 0.9-2 | source contacts | 0.9-2+b1 | armhf, s390x contacts | 0.9-2+b2 | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, spar

Bug#723989: intermittent spurious NUL

2013-09-21 Thread Zefram
Package: nvi Version: 1.81.6-8.2 Severity: minor Occasionally, while entering text for an insert-like command, "^@" will appear on the screen immediately following the insertion point, as if there were a NUL character there in the file. It remains there during text entry, the "^@" moving along as