Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # no svn 1.7 in squeeze
> tags 644409 + wheezy sid
Bug #644409 [rapidsvn] rapidsvn SEGV with Subversion 1.7
Added tag(s) sid and wheezy.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
644409: http://bugs.debian.o
rapidsvn_0.12.0dfsg-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rapidsvn_0.12.0dfsg-6.dsc
rapidsvn_0.12.0dfsg-6.debian.tar.gz
rapidsvn_0.12.0dfsg-6_amd64.deb
libsvncpp3_0.12.0dfsg-6_amd64.deb
libsvncpp-dev_0.12.0dfsg-6_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debia
Accepted:
libsvncpp-dev_0.12.0dfsg-6_amd64.deb
to main/r/rapidsvn/libsvncpp-dev_0.12.0dfsg-6_amd64.deb
libsvncpp3_0.12.0dfsg-6_amd64.deb
to main/r/rapidsvn/libsvncpp3_0.12.0dfsg-6_amd64.deb
rapidsvn_0.12.0dfsg-6.debian.tar.gz
to main/r/rapidsvn/rapidsvn_0.12.0dfsg-6.debian.tar.gz
rapidsvn_
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libsvncpp-dev_0.12.0dfsg-6_amd64.deb: package says section is libdevel,
override says vcs.
rapidsvn_0.12.0dfsg-6_amd64.deb: package says section is x11, override says vcs.
Please note th
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:06:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678556: fixed in rapidsvn 0.12.0dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #678556,
regarding rapidsvn: please drop Build-Depends: libserf-0-0-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:06:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#644409: fixed in rapidsvn 0.12.0dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #644409,
regarding rapidsvn SEGV with Subversion 1.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
sgml-data_2.0.7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
sgml-data_2.0.7.dsc
sgml-data_2.0.7.tar.gz
sgml-data_2.0.7_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:39:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#674913: fixed in sgml-data 2.0.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #674913,
regarding sgml-data: do not call update-catalog
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:39:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#675488: fixed in sgml-data 2.0.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #675488,
regarding sgml-data: please rebuild to fix your copy of #477751
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Accepted:
sgml-data_2.0.7.dsc
to main/s/sgml-data/sgml-data_2.0.7.dsc
sgml-data_2.0.7.tar.gz
to main/s/sgml-data/sgml-data_2.0.7.tar.gz
sgml-data_2.0.7_all.deb
to main/s/sgml-data/sgml-data_2.0.7_all.deb
Changes:
sgml-data (2.0.7) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* Rebuild with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 606038 2.0.7
Bug #606038 [sgml-data] sgml-data: WARNING about obsolete update-catalog command
Marked as fixed in versions sgml-data/2.0.7.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
606038: http://bugs.
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 01:37:40 +0300
with message-id <1487221340491...@web19g.yandex.ru>
and subject line Re: Bug#606038: sgml-data: WARNING about obsolete
update-catalog
has caused the Debian Bug report #606038,
regarding sgml-data: WARNING about obsolete update-catalog command
to b
12 matches
Mail list logo