Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 677527 libwvstreams4.6-base
Bug #677527 [wvstreams] wvdial Aborts with error "Assertion `magic_number ==
-0x123678' failed."
Bug reassigned from package 'wvstreams' to 'libwvstreams4.6-base'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 644409 grave
Bug #644409 [rapidsvn] rapidsvn SEGV with Subversion 1.7
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
644409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Package: rapidsvn
Version: 0.12.0dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Please drop the 'Build-Depends: libserf-0-0-dev' from rapidsvn. It
appears not to be needed. If it _is_ needed, note that I have renamed
the package to 'libserf-dev'.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-package
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678528: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #238603,
regarding liballegro4a: Keyboard contains deadkeys ?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678528: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #216839,
regarding libalogg.so.1.3.3 is a non-PIC library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678528: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #359306,
regarding liballegro4.2: Broken on sparc: Bus error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678528: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #382920,
regarding messages "Xlib: unexpected async reply" from allegro
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678528: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #395909,
regarding liballegro4.2: programs using allegro segfault under valgrind
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678528: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #382952,
regarding messages "Xlib: unexpected async reply" from allegro
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678528: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #501744,
regarding liballegro4.2: The assembler code causes execmod access to be required
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:48:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678528: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #634503,
regarding allegro4.2: debian/control uses hardcoded list of non-Linux
architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
allegro-demo | 2:4.2.2-3 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64,
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
allegro-demo | 2:4.2.2-3+b1 | hurd-i386
allegro-exampl
Version: 2:4.2.2-3+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package allegro4.2 has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/678528
T
rbbr_0.6.0-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rbbr_0.6.0-4.dsc
rbbr_0.6.0-4.diff.gz
rbbr_0.6.0-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcdaudio".
It builds those binary packages:
libcdaudio-dbg - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs
(debug)
libcdaudio-dev - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio C
Accepted:
rbbr_0.6.0-4.diff.gz
to main/r/rbbr/rbbr_0.6.0-4.diff.gz
rbbr_0.6.0-4.dsc
to main/r/rbbr/rbbr_0.6.0-4.dsc
rbbr_0.6.0-4_all.deb
to main/r/rbbr/rbbr_0.6.0-4_all.deb
Changes:
rbbr (0.6.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Orphan package.
Override entries for your package:
rbbr_0.6.
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
rbbr_0.6.0-4_all.deb: package says section is devel, override says ruby.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 647975 !
Bug #647975 [libcdaudio] libcdaudio: FTBFS on hurd-i386
Owner recorded as Boris Pek .
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
647975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647975
owner 647975 !
thanks
RFS: http://bugs.debian.org/678581
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1254481340401...@web24g.yandex.ru
19 matches
Mail list logo
