Bug#676478: cuetools: please consider depending on id3v2 | python-mutagen

2012-06-07 Thread Rogério Brito
Package: cuetools Version: 1.3.1-12 Severity: wishlist Hi. cuetools depends on id3v2 which is currently badly broken (see its bugreports and their age). OTOH, mid3v2 from python-mutagen is a drop-in replacement for id3v2 with many fixes (and is actively maintained upstream). Therefore, it would

Bug#676501: [apt-build] Problem with package-revision +b2

2012-06-07 Thread Christoph Mühlmann
Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.43 Severity: normal --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Dear maintainer, I'm not sure, if this is the same as in bug #434859, which was closed in 0.12.42: I tried to recompile the sources of package ufraw from testing (0.18-1.1) locally with apt-

Bug#674006: libwvstreams4.6-base 4.6.1-4 ----- wvdial stopped working

2012-06-07 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 21:37:30 +1000, Peter Drysdale wrote: > As you were the kind DD who fixed the gcc 4.7 failure to build for > libwvstreaams4.6-base, I am emailing you > regarding this bug since you might be able to do a QA upload. Thanks for adding all these informations to the bug log! > I

Bug#673918: thttpd: New /etc/init.d script has bad logic and exits before starting daemon.

2012-06-07 Thread Owen Marshall
tags 673918 moreinfo thanks > I solved this by commneting out all lines between the setting of > variables and the "set -e" line before the case statment. It sounds to me like you forgot to set /etc/default/thttpd to ENABLED=yes. Did you make that change before editing the init.d script? -- Owe

Processed: your mail

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 673918 + moreinfo Bug #673918 [thttpd] thttpd: New /etc/init.d script has bad logic and exits before starting daemon. Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 673918: http://

Processed: your mail

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 674342 + fixed-upstream Bug #674342 [src:gnunet-fuse] fatal error: GNUnet/gnunet_ecrs_lib.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 674342: htt

Bug#674342: gnunet-fuse FTBFS

2012-06-07 Thread Bertrand Marc
GNUnet-fuse 0.9.3 is out, and it seems to build fine with gcc 4.7. So this bug is fixed upstream. I'll try to update the package as soon as possible, but it depends on GNUnet 0.9.3 which I need to package first. Cheers, Bertrand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.

Processed (with 1 errors): merging 434859 676501

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 434859 676501 Bug #434859 {Done: Dominique Lasserre } [apt-build] apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1" Unable to merge bugs because: done of #676501 is '' not 'Dominique Lasserre ' Failed to merge 4348

Processed: reopening 434859

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 434859 Bug #434859 {Done: Dominique Lasserre } [apt-build] apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1" 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be clea

Processed: merging 434859 676501

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 434859 676501 Bug #434859 [apt-build] apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1" Bug #434859 [apt-build] apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1" Marked as found in versio

Processed: tagging 676501

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 676501 + confirmed Bug #676501 [apt-build] [apt-build] Problem with package-revision +b2 Bug #434859 [apt-build] apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1" Added tag(s) confirmed. Added tag(s) confirmed. > th

Bug#676501: [apt-build] Problem with package-revision +b2

2012-06-07 Thread Dominique Lasserre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Christoph, thank you for reporting (reopening) this bug. I actually misunderstood #434859 . Afterwards I don't know why... apt-build currently uses debchange to increase (source) version number. If source and binary versions differ you can encount

Bug#671088: Removed package(s) from unstable

2012-06-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libmusicbrainz-2.1 | 2.1.5-6.2 | source libmusicbrainz4-dev | 2.1.5-6.2 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc libmus

Bug#671088: Removed package(s) from unstable

2012-06-07 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Version: 2.1.5-6.2+rm Dear submitter, as the package libmusicbrainz-2.1 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/6

Bug#384139: marked as done (infinite loop when www.musicbrainz.org is down)

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:46:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#671088: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #384139, regarding infinite loop when www.musicbrainz.org is down to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#663618: marked as done (libmusicbrainz-2.1: CPPFLAGS hardening flags missing)

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:46:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#671088: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #663618, regarding libmusicbrainz-2.1: CPPFLAGS hardening flags missing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#674006: libwvstreams4.6-base 4.6.1-4 ----- wvdial stopped working

2012-06-07 Thread Peter Drysdale
Dear Gregor, Thank you for your email. It forced me to look further into Debian procedures and policy. Between your email and details of Debian policy I think I have found a way forward. To avoid noise to your account I will not copy you to subsequent emails regarding this bug where I can avoid i

Bug#674006: libwvstreams4.6-base 4.6.1-4 ----- wvdial stopped working

2012-06-07 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:31:13 +1000, Peter Drysdale wrote: > Thank you for your email. It forced me to look further into Debian > procedures and policy. Between your email and details of Debian policy > I think I have found a way forward. Sounds great :) > To avoid noise to your account I will n

Bug#674006: libwvstreams4.6-base 4.6.1-4 ----- wvdial stopped working

2012-06-07 Thread Peter Drysdale
The purpose of this email is to set forth the reasons for raising the severity of this bug and describe my intentions. 1) I intend to increase the severity to release critical. The Debian document regarding severity states: critical makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole system) br

Processed: Raising severity

2012-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 674006 critical Bug #674006 [libwvstreams4.6-base] wvdial stop working: Assertion `magic_number == -0x123678' failed Severity set to 'critical' from 'important' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Re: Bug#676478: cuetools: please consider depending on id3v2 | python-mutagen

2012-06-07 Thread Asheesh Laroia
Excerpts from Rogério Brito's message of Thu Jun 07 04:30:02 -0400 2012: > Package: cuetools > Version: 1.3.1-12 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi. > > cuetools depends on id3v2 which is currently badly broken (see its > bugreports and their age). > > OTOH, mid3v2 from python-mutagen is a drop-in repl

Bug#674006:

2012-06-07 Thread Peter Drysdale
Please find attached a draft patch refreshed in the Debian style. This patch has passed build testing only on a Debian system. It has passed testing on Fedora. Run-time testing this patch on Debian will have to await either till I get access to the hardware effected or another person affected by