Re: Bug#654417: Migration on good tracks

Hi again. Cyril Brulebois (25/02/2012): > Broken packages (in unstable): arb/non-free openmsx rlvm spring tulip > > The following packages are marked as bad on the tracker[1]: > - arb/non-free, missing libmotif-dev on other platforms, so not >binNMU'd. Building non-free issue: #661280 >

Bug#649819: marked as done (openmsx: FTBFS: src/video/PNG.cc:170:21: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'png_info {aka struct png_info_def}')

Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#649819: fixed in openmsx 0.8.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #649819, regarding openmsx: FTBFS: src/video/PNG.cc:170:21: error: invalid use of incomplete type 'png_info {aka struct png_info_def}' to be ma

Bug#659040: marked as done (openmsx: New version released: openMSX 0.8.2)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#659040: fixed in openmsx 0.8.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #659040, regarding openmsx: New version released: openMSX 0.8.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#660415: marked as done (openmsx FTBFS in unstable. /usr/include/zlib.h:1204:26: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct gzFile_s* gzFile')

Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#660415: fixed in openmsx 0.8.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #660415, regarding openmsx FTBFS in unstable. /usr/include/zlib.h:1204:26: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef struct gzFile_s* gzFile' to

Bug#578046: currupts archives on 64bit systems with buffers larger than 2gb

On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Yuri D'Elia wrote: Package: afio Severity: important Tags: patch When the block size * block count equals to 2gb or more, afio corrupts the archive by truncating all files larger than 2gb. [...] Thanks for the bug report and patch, I am reviewing and incorporating it i

Processing of apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.changes

apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-pack

Bug#592006: marked as done (apt-build: Should use "debchange" instead of "debchange --append")

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#592006: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #592006, regarding apt-build: Should use "debchange" instead of "debchange --append" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#314155: marked as done (Unable to find source information for hpijs at /usr/bin/apt-build line 475. (source is called 'hplip'))

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#314155: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #314155, regarding Unable to find source information for hpijs at /usr/bin/apt-build line 475. (source is called 'hplip') to be marked as don

Bug#391449: marked as done (apt-build: update-source thinks it should downgrade to lower-priority version)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#391449: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #391449, regarding apt-build: update-source thinks it should downgrade to lower-priority version to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#292169: marked as done (apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#291565: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #291565, regarding apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#292169: marked as done (apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#292169: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #292169, regarding apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#507881: marked as done (apt-build failes with sources using cmake)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#507881: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #507881, regarding apt-build failes with sources using cmake to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#425044: marked as done (apt-build cannot find source package gtk+2.0)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#425044: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #425044, regarding apt-build cannot find source package gtk+2.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#369173: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#316572: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #316572, regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#179850: marked as done (Does not build from source only (without binary packages available))

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#292169: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #292169, regarding Does not build from source only (without binary packages available) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#596296: marked as done (apt-build: assumes sources.list is used and fails when all package sources are stored in sources.list.d)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#596296: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #596296, regarding apt-build: assumes sources.list is used and fails when all package sources are stored in sources.list.d to be marked as do

Bug#291565: marked as done ([soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back])

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#292169: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #292169, regarding [soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back] to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#316572: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#369173: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #369173, regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#624365: marked as done (apt-build: Fails to find source package)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#624365: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #624365, regarding apt-build: Fails to find source package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#292169: marked as done (apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#179850: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #179850, regarding apt-build failed again to build a dpkg if only src are available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#179850: marked as done (Does not build from source only (without binary packages available))

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#291565: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #291565, regarding Does not build from source only (without binary packages available) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#511853: marked as done ([apt-build] fails to install because of error in post-installation script)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#511853: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #511853, regarding [apt-build] fails to install because of error in post-installation script to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#660590: marked as done (apt-build: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#660590: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #660590, regarding apt-build: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#291565: marked as done ([soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back])

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#291565: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #291565, regarding [soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back] to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#392844: marked as done (apt-build: wrong option listed on --help and fails with aptitude backend)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#392844: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #392844, regarding apt-build: wrong option listed on --help and fails with aptitude backend to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#316572: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#316572: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #316572, regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#434859: marked as done (apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1")

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#434859: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #434859, regarding apt-build doesn't handles correctly packages revision terminated with "+b1" to be marked as done. This means that you cla

Bug#520818: marked as done ([apt-build] apt-build fails to install)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#511853: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #511853, regarding [apt-build] apt-build fails to install to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#369173: marked as done (Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#369173: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #369173, regarding Doesn't work with authenticated apt; needs to sign debs or --allow-unauthenticated to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#315102: marked as done (apt-build: build-source downloads other version than it tries to build)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#315102: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #315102, regarding apt-build: build-source downloads other version than it tries to build to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#291565: marked as done ([soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back])

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#179850: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #179850, regarding [soete.j...@tiscali.be: apt-build: pb to build without bin available is back] to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#179850: marked as done (Does not build from source only (without binary packages available))

Your message dated Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:32:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#179850: fixed in apt-build 0.12.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #179850, regarding Does not build from source only (without binary packages available) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.dsc apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42.tar.gz apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb to main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.42_mipsel.deb Override entries for your package: apt-build_0.12.42.dsc - source