Re: 642371 to Should the scim-bridge package be removed?

On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:09:22 + Dale Amon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:27:22PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > > > > > retitle 642371 Should this package be removed? > > Bug #642371 [src:scim-bridge] RM: scim-bridge -- ROM

Bug#655512: Bug #655512: adept: FTBFS: /usr/include/xapian/keymaker.h:125:7: error: expected primary-expression before '.' token

I tried to rebuild version adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1 in pbuilder on a linux-amd64 machine, and the build works fine for me. Looking at the logs of kfreebsd-amd64 and mips, the errors were not same. I would like to ask if it's possible to retry the build on these two architectures? -- Regards, Aron Xu

Bug#647231: libvisual-plugins: FTBFS(!linux): error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_ALSA

Note: I have no particular relationship to this package, i'm just trying to reduce the number of uninstallable packages in armhf testing. configure.ac:210: warning: macro `AM_PATH_ALSA' not found in library configure.ac:210: error: possibly undefined macro: AM_PATH_ALSA If this token and ot

Processed: libxp dependencies

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 657253 by 623660 623661 623662 623663 623664 623665 623667 657260 Bug #657253 [libxp6] Xprint is deprecated, so remove libxp? Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 657253: 623661, 623665, 623664, 623667, 623660, 623662, 6572