tag 618706 patch
thanks
Hi.
I created a patch which revise this problem.
I attached.
This checks whether to have SA_RESTORER.
Please check this patch.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 618706 patch
Bug #618706 [src:afnix] FTBFS [alpha,ia64,hppa]: error: 'struct sigaction' has
no member named 'sa_restorer'
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
618706: http://bug
I forgot that attach patch
thanks,
Nobuhiro
2011/9/5 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
> tag 618706 patch
> thanks
>
> Hi.
>
> I created a patch which revise this problem.
> I attached.
> This checks whether to have SA_RESTORER.
>
> Please check this patch.
>
> Best regards,
> Nobuhiro
>
> --
> Nobuhiro
clone 564576 -1
clone 564576 -2
reassign -1 spfmilter
severity -1 important
retitle -1 libspf0 going away
reassign -2 whitelister
severity -2 important
retitle -2 libspf0 going away
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I replied directly, rather than to the bug by mis
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 564576 -1
Bug#564576: libspf0: fails with IPv6
Bug 564576 cloned as bug 640495.
> clone 564576 -2
Bug#564576: libspf0: fails with IPv6
Bug 564576 cloned as bug 640496.
> reassign -1 spfmilter
Bug #640495 [libspf0] libspf0: fails with IPv6
Package: mgp
Version: 1.13a+upstream20090219-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Sir,
I would be great if there were a switch to do automatic page when text is to
long.
Please find the example below, then one could use it to display daily very
important informations.
mgp is great and very useful
more
Source: ifrit
Version: 3.3.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110902 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/c++ -DI_USE_CURSES
Package: ca-certificates
Version: 20110502+nmu1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ca-certificates still ships the following two certificates that are
being removed from Mozilla following the DigiNotar debacle:
Staat_der
On Tuesday 30 August 2011 12:29:23 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> AFAIR they only know about CRL (Certificate Revocation List,) which only
> allows for one issuer per-file.
>
> What I can't tell for sure from the documentation is whether OpenSSL and
> GnuTLS do check the CRL's validity (signature and t
On Sunday 04 September 2011 05:55:27 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:02:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Their is also openssl-blacklist, but it doesn't seem to have
> > much users.
However, opensl-blacklist only includes a program that checks wether a
certificate is weak, nothi
Your message dated Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:19:07 -0500
with message-id <201109051419.08501.geiss...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#640567: ca-certificates: Remove
Staat_der_Nederlanden_Root_CA certificates
has caused the Debian Bug report #640567,
regarding ca-certificates: Remove Staat_der_Neder
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:15:31PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Sunday 04 September 2011 05:55:27 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:02:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Their is also openssl-blacklist, but it doesn't seem to have
> > > much users.
>
> However, opensl-blac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 640567 scilab
Bug #640567 {Done: Raphael Geissert } [ca-certificates]
ca-certificates: Remove Staat_der_Nederlanden_Root_CA certificates
Bug reassigned from package 'ca-certificates' to 'scilab'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 640567
Bug#640567: ca-certificates: Remove Staat_der_Nederlanden_Root_CA certificates
Bug#639924: FTBFS: Could not load JVM dynamic library (libjava).
Bug#640573: scilab-plotlib: FTBFS: Error: libjvm.so: cannot open shared object
file: No
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 640567 ca-certificates 20110502+nmu1
Bug #640567 {Done: Raphael Geissert } [ca-certificates]
ca-certificates: Remove Staat_der_Nederlanden_Root_CA certificates
Ignoring request to reassign bug #640567 to the same package
Bug #640567 {Don
package: ca-certificates
severity: wishlist
tags: patch l10n
Please consider to add this file to translation of debconf.
--
brother
http://sis.bthstuden.se
sv.po
Description: Binary data
Hi,
I updated a patch.
I made a patch more simply.
Best regards,
Nobuhirio
2011/9/5 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
> I forgot that attach patch
>
> thanks,
> Nobuhiro
>
> 2011/9/5 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu :
>> tag 618706 patch
>> thanks
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I created a patch which revise this problem.
>> I atta
Your message dated Tue, 06 Sep 2011 03:02:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#618706: fixed in afnix 2.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #618706,
regarding FTBFS [alpha,ia64,hppa]: error: 'struct sigaction' has no member
named 'sa_restorer'
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Tue, 06 Sep 2011 03:02:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#618978: fixed in afnix 2.1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #618978,
regarding afnix: FTBFS: #error "unknown processor type"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
afnix_2.1.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
afnix_2.1.1-1.dsc
afnix_2.1.1.orig.tar.gz
afnix_2.1.1-1.debian.tar.bz2
afnix_2.1.1-1_amd64.deb
afnix-doc_2.1.1-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
afnix-doc_2.1.1-1_all.deb
to main/a/afnix/afnix-doc_2.1.1-1_all.deb
afnix_2.1.1-1.debian.tar.bz2
to main/a/afnix/afnix_2.1.1-1.debian.tar.bz2
afnix_2.1.1-1.dsc
to main/a/afnix/afnix_2.1.1-1.dsc
afnix_2.1.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/a/afnix/afnix_2.1.1-1_amd64.deb
afnix_2.1.1.orig.tar
Your message dated Tue, 06 Sep 2011 04:32:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#618706: fixed in afnix 2.1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #618706,
regarding FTBFS [alpha,ia64,hppa]: error: 'struct sigaction' has no member
named 'sa_restorer'
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
afnix_2.1.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
afnix_2.1.1-2.dsc
afnix_2.1.1-2.debian.tar.bz2
afnix_2.1.1-2_amd64.deb
afnix-doc_2.1.1-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Accepted:
afnix-doc_2.1.1-2_all.deb
to main/a/afnix/afnix-doc_2.1.1-2_all.deb
afnix_2.1.1-2.debian.tar.bz2
to main/a/afnix/afnix_2.1.1-2.debian.tar.bz2
afnix_2.1.1-2.dsc
to main/a/afnix/afnix_2.1.1-2.dsc
afnix_2.1.1-2_amd64.deb
to main/a/afnix/afnix_2.1.1-2_amd64.deb
Override entries f
jakarta-ecs_1.4.2-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
jakarta-ecs_1.4.2-2.dsc
jakarta-ecs_1.4.2-2.diff.gz
libjakarta-ecs-java_1.4.2-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
ispell-fi_0.7-18_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ispell-fi_0.7-18.dsc
ispell-fi_0.7-18.diff.gz
wfinnish_0.7-18_all.deb
myspell-fi_0.7-18_all.deb
ifinnish_0.7-18_amd64.deb
ifinnish-small_0.7-18_amd64.deb
ifinnish-large_0.7-18_amd64.deb
aspell-fi
Accepted:
aspell-fi_0.7-18_amd64.deb
to main/i/ispell-fi/aspell-fi_0.7-18_amd64.deb
ifinnish-large_0.7-18_amd64.deb
to main/i/ispell-fi/ifinnish-large_0.7-18_amd64.deb
ifinnish-small_0.7-18_amd64.deb
to main/i/ispell-fi/ifinnish-small_0.7-18_amd64.deb
ifinnish_0.7-18_amd64.deb
to main/i/
Accepted:
jakarta-ecs_1.4.2-2.diff.gz
to main/j/jakarta-ecs/jakarta-ecs_1.4.2-2.diff.gz
jakarta-ecs_1.4.2-2.dsc
to main/j/jakarta-ecs/jakarta-ecs_1.4.2-2.dsc
libjakarta-ecs-java_1.4.2-2_all.deb
to main/j/jakarta-ecs/libjakarta-ecs-java_1.4.2-2_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
j
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:55:50PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:15:31PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > On Sunday 04 September 2011 05:55:27 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 12:02:48PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > Their is also openssl-blacklist, bu
29 matches
Mail list logo