Processing of codelite_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4_amd64.changes

codelite_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: codelite_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4.dsc codelite_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4.debian.tar.gz codelite_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4_amd64.deb codelite-plugins_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

codelite_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: codelite-plugins_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4_amd64.deb to main/c/codelite/codelite-plugins_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4_amd64.deb codelite_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4.debian.tar.gz to main/c/codelite/codelite_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4.debian.tar.gz codelite_2.8.0.4537~dfsg-4.dsc to main/c/codelite/codelite_2.8.0.4537~

Processing of libast_0.7-6_amd64.changes

libast_0.7-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libast_0.7-6.dsc libast_0.7-6.debian.tar.gz libast2_0.7-6_amd64.deb libast2-dev_0.7-6_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#639560: marked as done (symbol changes)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:17:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#639560: fixed in libast 0.7-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #639560, regarding symbol changes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

libast_0.7-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: libast2-dev_0.7-6_amd64.deb to main/liba/libast/libast2-dev_0.7-6_amd64.deb libast2_0.7-6_amd64.deb to main/liba/libast/libast2_0.7-6_amd64.deb libast_0.7-6.debian.tar.gz to main/liba/libast/libast_0.7-6.debian.tar.gz libast_0.7-6.dsc to main/liba/libast/libast_0.7-6.dsc Over

Bug#625411: tla: I can't reproduce this bug

Hi, This package is building ok for me. I am using gcc version 4.6.1-8 in a pbuilder environment. Lookink at the logs, I think it is not using -Werror option. Maybe I'm missing something or we can close this bug? Thanks for your work! Mònica -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-r

News about unixcw?

Hi Simon, Recently I've started using cwcp program from unixcw package to learn Morse code. I find it very useful, but I have also noticed that the program has some problems. Some of them have been addressed by patches created by Kamal Mostafa (https://launchpad.net/~kamalmostafa/+archive/uni

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:08:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On lun., 2011-08-29 at 20:24 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > I understand that they'd have to manually load the lists, but perhaps it > > would make sense to standardize a location from which they should load > > them? Does OpenSSL or G

Processing of tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5_amd64.changes

tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5.dsc tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5.debian.tar.gz tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-pac

tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5.debian.tar.gz to main/t/tijmp/tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5.debian.tar.gz tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5.dsc to main/t/tijmp/tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5.dsc tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5_amd64.deb to main/t/tijmp/tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: tijmp_0.8+dfsg-5.dsc - source devel t

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:08:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On lun., 2011-08-29 at 20:24 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > I understand that they'd have to manually load the lists, but perhaps it > > > would make sense to standardize

Processing of javatar_2.5+dfsg-5_amd64.changes

javatar_2.5+dfsg-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: javatar_2.5+dfsg-5.dsc javatar_2.5+dfsg-5.debian.tar.gz libjavatar-java_2.5+dfsg-5_all.deb libjavatar-java-doc_2.5+dfsg-5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.d

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:08:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > On lun., 2011-08-29 at 20:24 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > I understand that they'd have to ma

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On mar., 2011-08-30 at 22:48 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > 1. Several fraudulent certificates whose fingerprint is unknown signed > with several different intermediate certs that are cross-signed by other > "safe" CAs (aiui). I missed that. What is the source for that? (i looked at the mozilla b

javatar_2.5+dfsg-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: javatar_2.5+dfsg-5.debian.tar.gz to main/j/javatar/javatar_2.5+dfsg-5.debian.tar.gz javatar_2.5+dfsg-5.dsc to main/j/javatar/javatar_2.5+dfsg-5.dsc libjavatar-java-doc_2.5+dfsg-5_all.deb to main/j/javatar/libjavatar-java-doc_2.5+dfsg-5_all.deb libjavatar-java_2.5+dfsg-5_all.deb

Bug#465900: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: perlsgml | 1:19970918-13 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned -- Note that the package(s) have simply

Bug#639859: apt-build fails to build packages ; it conflicts with apt

Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.38 Severity: grave Tags: sid wheezy patch Justification: renders package unusable Trying to install a package with apt-build, for example: # apt-build install hello it fails with: >W: Failed to fetch >file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository/dists/apt-build/Release U

Processing of python-scientific_2.8-3_amd64.changes

python-scientific_2.8-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-scientific_2.8-3.dsc python-scientific_2.8-3.diff.gz python-scientific_2.8-3_all.deb python-scientific-doc_2.8-3_all.deb python-mpi_2.8-3_all.deb python-netcdf_2.8-3_amd64.deb mpich2p

python-scientific_2.8-3_amd64.changes is NEW

(new) mpich2python_2.8-3_amd64.deb optional python MPI-enhanced Python interpreter (MPICH2 based version) The package provides a python interpreter with MPI (Message Passing Interface, message-based parallel programming) support. (new) openmpipython_2.8-3_amd64.deb extra python MPI-enhanced Pytho

Processed: reassign 637125 to ca-certificates-java, forcibly merging 635571 637125

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 637125 ca-certificates-java Bug #637125 [ca-certificates] Exception in thread "main" java.security.ProviderException: Could not initialize NSS Bug reassigned from package 'ca-certificates' to 'ca-certificates-java'. > forcemerge 635571 6

Processing of ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1_i386.changes

ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1.dsc ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1.tar.gz ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

Bug#639744: marked as done (Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Aug 2011 02:47:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#639744: fixed in ca-certificates 20110502+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #639744, regarding Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA to be marked as done. This means that yo

ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1.dsc to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1.dsc ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1.tar.gz to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1.tar.gz ca-certificates_20110502+nmu1_all.deb to main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_201105

Bug#193061: adopting lgeneral?

Hi, You mentioned you were planning to adopt lgeneral after squeeze's release and squeeze has been out for a couple of months now. I was just curious about the status of this. Thanks, Drew Daniels http://www.boxheap.net/ddaniels/blog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On Tuesday 30 August 2011 15:48:11 Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > What I can't tell for sure from the documentation is whether OpenSSL > > > and GnuTLS do check the CRL's v

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:08:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > > On lun., 2011-08-29 at 20:24 -0

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:0

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:49:04PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 15:48:11 Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > What I can't tell for sure from

Bug#639744: Accepted ca-certificates 20110502+nmu1 (source all)

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Changes: > ca-certificates (20110502+nmu1) unstable; urgency=high > . >* Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team. >* Blacklist "DigiNotar Root CA" (Closes: #639744) Are we updating stable too? Cheers, weasel --