tags 622003 + fixed-upstream
thanks
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 02:02:32PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
>
> Relevant part:
> > g++ -c -pipe -g -D_REENTRANT -Wall -W -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB
> > -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/s
Package: opencryptoki
Version: 2.2.8+dfsg-4
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be e
Package: libxml++
Version: 1.0.4-3
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either rem
Package: libspf
Version: 0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-3
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can b
Package: librsync
Version: 0.9.7-7
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either rem
Package: libytnef
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either remov
6 matches
Mail list logo