Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 620825 by 519567
Bug #620825 [bacula-director-common] bacula-director-common: wrong email From
address
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 620825: 519567
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Hi,
I'm Daniel Echeverry and I want to join the team to maintain orphans
packages, I've been using free software from 5 years ago, and I love GNU
Debian for your philosophy, quality and great community !
Regards.
Daniel
--
Epsilon
http://www.rinconinformatico.net
http://www.fitnessdeportes.com
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:51:30 -0500
Daniel Echeverry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm Daniel Echeverry and I want to join the team to maintain orphans
> packages, I've been using free software from 5 years ago, and I love GNU
> Debian for your philosophy, quality and great community !
First thing to do is a
qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
qorganizer_3.1.5-2.dsc
qorganizer_3.1.5-2.diff.gz
qorganizer-translations_3.1.5-2_all.deb
qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.deb
qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
qorganizer_3.1.5-2.dsc
qorganizer_3.1.5-2.diff.gz
qorganizer-translations_3.1.5-2_all.deb
qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
qorganizer-translations_3.1.5-2_all.deb
to main/q/qorganizer/qorganizer-translations_3.1.5-2_all.deb
qorganizer_3.1.5-2.diff.gz
to main/q/qorganizer/qorganizer_3.1.5-2.diff.gz
qorganizer_3.1.5-2.dsc
to main/q/qorganizer/qorganizer_3.1.5-2.dsc
qorganizer_3.1.5-2_i386.deb
to main
Package: adplug
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of
Package: ddccontrol
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or strippe
Package: db4.6
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of
Package: bacula
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of
Package: db
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of the
Package: beecrypt
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped
Package: db4.7
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of
Package: gnuift
Severity: normal
User: codeh...@debian.org
Usertags: la-file-removal
To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
or stripped of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 621321 620755
Bug#620755: gnuift: Please stop shipping .la file in -dev packages (Policy 10.2)
Bug#621321: gnuift: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
Merged 620755 621321.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc
gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz
gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb
gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb
gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-10_amd64.
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:18:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#506500: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #506500,
regarding gnuift: Missing --install argument to libtoolize call
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:18:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#616251: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #616251,
regarding gnuift: replace doxygen and texlive-* build dependencies with
doxygen-latex
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:18:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#620755: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #620755,
regarding gnuift: Please stop shipping .la file in -dev packages (Policy 10.2)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:18:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#620755: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #620755,
regarding gnuift: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:18:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#620912: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #620912,
regarding gnuift: FTBFS (tries to install twice the same file)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Accepted:
gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb
gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb
gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz
gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc
to main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb: package says section is graphics, override says
doc.
gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb: package says section is graphics, override says
perl.
Please note that
gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
gnuift_0.1.14-10.dsc
gnuift_0.1.14-10.diff.gz
gnuift-doc_0.1.14-10_all.deb
gnuift-perl_0.1.14-10_all.deb
gnuift_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-10_amd64.deb
libgnuift0-dev_0.1.
Package: rapidsvn
Version: 0.12.0dfsg-3
Severity: normal
User: pkg-db-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: db5.1
Your package currently still uses Berkeley DB version 4.8 (libdb4.8).
However, there is a newer Berkeley DB version in the archive (libdb5.1),
with a compatible API. Berkeley DB ve
25 matches
Mail list logo
