Bug#596154: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: lsnipes |0.9.4-7 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, dead upstream, u

Bug#596145: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: workman | 1.3.4-29 | source, alpha, armel, hppa, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, unused, dead upstream, altern

Bug#593163: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: hindent |1.1.2-8 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; obsolete, unmaintained, dead upstream, orphaned for a long time -

Bug#596146: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: wmmaiload |2.3.0-1 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --

Bug#596118: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: u++ |5.3.0-2 | source, amd64, i386, ia64 u++-doc |5.3.0-2 | all --- Reason --- RoQA; unused, orphaned, dead upstream -

Bug#583597: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: bake | 1.0-14 | source, all --- Reason --- dead upstream, unused, no reverse deps -- Note that the pa

Bug#596147: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: wmbinclock | 0.5-5 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --

Bug#596157: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: wmblob |1.0.3-3 | source, alpha, amd64, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc wmblob | 1.0.3-3+b1 | armel, ia64

Bug#596158: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: anymeal | 0.30-9 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --- R

Bug#596114: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: wmmisc | 1.1-5 | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc --- Reason --

tkmixer REMOVED from testing

2010-09-09 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the tkmixer source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0-19 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files.

transcriber REMOVED from testing

2010-09-09 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the transcriber source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.5.1.1-4 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint

nstx REMOVED from testing

2010-09-09 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the nstx source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.1-beta6-6 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint file

Bug#254966: marked as done (nstx should pass through dns queries to a real dns server)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #254966, regarding nstx should pass through dns queries to a real dns server to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#259339: marked as done (nstx: return value of malloc() is never checked anywhere)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #259339, regarding nstx: return value of malloc() is never checked anywhere to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#274636: marked as done (tkmixer: channel Digital1 causes white noise)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203456.4772.94194.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line tkmixer removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #274636, regarding tkmixer: channel Digital1 causes white noise to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#291482: marked as done (transcriber: feature request: slow down sound like Audacity's "change tempo")

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203525.4772.44963.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line transcriber removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #291482, regarding transcriber: feature request: slow down sound like Audacity's "change tempo" to be marked

Bug#307772: marked as done (nstx: Fail to parse some DNS responses)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #307772, regarding nstx: Fail to parse some DNS responses to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#317786: marked as done (nstx: init script doesn't report daemon start failure)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #317786, regarding nstx: init script doesn't report daemon start failure to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#393339: marked as done (segfault in nstxd)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #393339, regarding segfault in nstxd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#398356: marked as done (provide a way to name the interface)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #398356, regarding provide a way to name the interface to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#428529: marked as done (Starting nstx at arbitary times)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #428529, regarding Starting nstx at arbitary times to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#467216: marked as done (nstxcd fails with IPv6 DNS resolver)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #467216, regarding nstxcd fails with IPv6 DNS resolver to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#468446: marked as done (Memleaks in nstxcd)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #468446, regarding Memleaks in nstxcd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#477800: marked as done (tkmixer: Doesn't run (can't open /dev/mixer))

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203456.4772.94194.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line tkmixer removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #477800, regarding tkmixer: Doesn't run (can't open /dev/mixer) to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#515309: marked as done (nstx: init restart action not equivalent to stop+start and fails miserably)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #515309, regarding nstx: init restart action not equivalent to stop+start and fails miserably to be marked as done.

Bug#550401: marked as done (return value of write ignored in nstx_tuntap.c)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #550401, regarding return value of write ignored in nstx_tuntap.c to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#553297: marked as done (nstx: Uses non-standard '_' in domain names)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #553297, regarding nstx: Uses non-standard '_' in domain names to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#553299: marked as done (nstx: Does not support cross-endianness)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #553299, regarding nstx: Does not support cross-endianness to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#589328: marked as done (Short write in nstx_tuntap.c)

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated with message-id <20100909203528.4772.62981.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org> and subject line nstx removed from Debian unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #589328, regarding Short write in nstx_tuntap.c to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: tagging 475727

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 475727 + confirmed Bug #475727 [offlineimap] offlineimap: Aborts if the server refuses to store a message Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 475727: http://bugs.debian.or

Bug#475727: One way to reproduce this

2010-09-09 Thread Rogério Brito
I think that I found one way to reproduce this in a way that would serve for debugging purposes: With a gmail account, if you are trying to upload to the gmail servers an "e-mail" that is a chat of theirs, then they will refuse the upload (tested also with mutt and icedove). The most informative m

Bug#590537: offlineimap dies under many situations

2010-09-09 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi. Or should I say "ping"? Unfortunately, it seems that offlineimap is very sensitive to many situations and dies quite frequently. I suspect that, aside from the "die always", it may also be under some deadlock situations (or would that be the "new" python 2.6 that is in sid)? Apart from dying

Bug#596291: offlineimap getting stuck when run with multiple threads/connections

2010-09-09 Thread Rogério Brito
Package: offlineimap Severity: important As I reported in another bug (about offlineimap dying too easily under many circumstances), attached is what I see when I strace one of the running threads of offlineimap when it is run with 10 connections to initially mirror my gmail account to a local mai

Bug#596115: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: varkon |1.18B-1 | source, alpha, amd64, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc varkon-programmer-manual |1.18B-1 | all v

Bug#595393: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: open.app | 0.1+20061029-3 | source open.app | 0.1+20061029-3+b1 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 open.app | 0.1+20061029-3+b2 | hurd-i386 open.app | 0.1+20061029-3+b3 | alpha, amd64,

Bug#596116: Removed package(s) from unstable

2010-09-09 Thread Debian Archive Maintenance
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: tkpaint |1.5.4-7 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; orphaned, unused, dead upstream, alternatives exist -