Bug#451062: marked as done (rscheme: lintian error, orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:26:11 + (WET) with message-id <20100223222611.e13a02...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line Package rscheme has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #451062, regarding rscheme: lintian error, orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders to

Bug#230292: marked as done (sound-recorder: Typo in manpage, -A is mentioned twice)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:22:37 + (WET) with message-id <2010022337.113a42...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line Package sound-recorder has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #230292, regarding sound-recorder: Typo in manpage, -A is mentioned twice to be m

Bug#571199: ships libdrvproxy.so, but doesn't really

Package: libiodbc2-dev Version: 3.52.6-4 Hi, % ls -l /usr/lib/libdrvproxy.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 2009-11-23 20:20 /usr/lib/libdrvproxy.so -> libdrvproxy.so.2.1.18 % ls -l /usr/lib/libdrvproxy.so.2.1.18 ls: cannot access /usr/lib/libdrvproxy.so.2.1.18: No such file or directory % dpkg -S /u

Bug#438051: marked as done (sound-recorder: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1))

Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:22:37 + (WET) with message-id <2010022337.3e9ab2...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line Package sound-recorder has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #438051, regarding sound-recorder: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1

Bug#350125: marked as done (sound-recorder: it does not stop when it failed to open destination file)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:22:36 + (WET) with message-id <2010022336.f2b962...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line Package sound-recorder has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #350125, regarding sound-recorder: it does not stop when it failed to open destin

Bug#113516: marked as done (rscheme: ia64 build fails - illegal instruction in rshell/rs)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:26:11 + (WET) with message-id <20100223222612.057352...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line Package rscheme has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #113516, regarding rscheme: ia64 build fails - illegal instruction in rshell/rs to be ma

Bug#251570: marked as done (rscheme: bad compiled-in library paths)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:26:11 + (WET) with message-id <20100223222611.ca2752...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line Package rscheme has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #251570, regarding rscheme: bad compiled-in library paths to be marked as done. This me

Bug#316465: marked as done (sound-recorder: Cannot handle large files)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:22:37 + (WET) with message-id <2010022337.2d8312...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line Package sound-recorder has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #316465, regarding sound-recorder: Cannot handle large files to be marked as done

Bug#571208: editobj: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default

Source: editobj Version: 0.5.7-8 Severity: important User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python2.6 Hello, When rebuilt in an environment with Python 2.6 as the default version, your package failed to build from source. Here are the relevant parts of the build log: | cd . && python

Bug#493601: marked as done (libcml-smlnj needs better short and long descriptions)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:33:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#493601: fixed in smlnj 110.72-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #493601, regarding libcml-smlnj needs better short and long descriptions to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#562359: marked as done (smlnj: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: tetex-extra)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:33:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#562359: fixed in smlnj 110.72-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #562359, regarding smlnj: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: tetex-extra to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#530119: marked as done (libsmlnj-smlnj: bashism in /bin/sh script)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:33:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#530119: fixed in smlnj 110.72-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #530119, regarding libsmlnj-smlnj: bashism in /bin/sh script to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 525226 libvncserver0 0.9.3.dfsg.1-1 Bug #525226 [krdc] krdc: disconnecting from vnc doesn't really disconnect Bug reassigned from package 'krdc' to 'libvncserver0'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions kdenetwork/4:4.2.2-1. Bug #5252

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #stupid line breaks, sorry for the noise, here it comes again > forwarded 525226 > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2794565&group_id=32584&atid=405858 Bug #525226 [libvncserver0] krdc: disconnecting from vnc doesn't really disconn

Processed: found 409248 in 1.18.0-1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 409248 1.18.0-1 Bug #409248 [modconf] modconf: installation of bcm43xx succedes, but driver not loaded There is no source info for the package 'modconf' at version '1.18.0-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version

Processed: tagging 398256

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 398256 wontfix Bug #398256 [gnats] gnats: improvement in debconf templates pot file Added tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Processed: closing 435328

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 435328 4.1.0-0.3 Bug#435328: gnats: please adjust dependency from netbase to update-inetd 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 4.1.0-0.3, send any further explanations to St

Processing of gnats_4.1.0-1_amd64.changes

gnats_4.1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: gnats_4.1.0-1.dsc gnats_4.1.0-1.diff.gz gnats-user_4.1.0-1_amd64.deb gnats_4.1.0-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host kassia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Processing of gnats_4.1.0-1_amd64.changes

gnats_4.1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnats_4.1.0-1.dsc gnats_4.1.0-1.diff.gz gnats-user_4.1.0-1_amd64.deb gnats_4.1.0-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

gnats_4.1.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gnats-user_4.1.0-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gnats/gnats-user_4.1.0-1_amd64.deb gnats_4.1.0-1.diff.gz to main/g/gnats/gnats_4.1.0-1.diff.gz gnats_4.1.0-1.dsc to main/g/gnats/gnats_4.1.0-1.dsc gnats_4.1.0-1_amd64.deb to main/g/gnats/gnats_4.1.0-1_amd64.deb Override entries for your

Bug#484001: marked as done (Using obsolete .dhelp files)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:35:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#484001: fixed in gnats 4.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #484001, regarding Using obsolete .dhelp files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#366890: marked as done (gnats: refuses to accept connections)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:35:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#366890: fixed in gnats 4.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #366890, regarding gnats: refuses to accept connections to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#558207: marked as done (gnats: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: outdated build system)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:35:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#558207: fixed in gnats 4.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #558207, regarding gnats: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: outdated build system to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#569648: d4x: Difference between license in files and in COPYING file

Le Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:52:53AM +0200, Arnaud GRANAL a écrit : > > I have bad news about this. > > Maxim is very clear about this issue: > "You can distribute only unmodified sources." =( Hi Arnaud, Sorry to read this. Note that Debian actually allows that kind of clauses, if they are accomp

Bug#569648: d4x: Difference between license in files and in COPYING file

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:52:53AM +0200, Arnaud GRANAL a écrit : > > > > I have bad news about this. > > > > Maxim is very clear about this issue: > > "You can distribute only unmodified sources." =( > > Hi Arnaud, > Hi Charles, > > Sor

RM: d4x -- RoQA; non-free

reassign 569648 ftp.debian.org retitle 569648 RM: d4x -- RoQA; non-free affects 569648 + d4x thanks Dear FTP team, can you remove d4x ? At a first glance, it looks like distributed under the Artistic license, but source file headers and discussion with upstream show that he really meant much more

Processed: RM: d4x -- RoQA; non-free

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 569648 ftp.debian.org Bug #569648 [d4x] d4x: license problem Bug reassigned from package 'd4x' to 'ftp.debian.org'. > retitle 569648 RM: d4x -- RoQA; non-free Bug #569648 [ftp.debian.org] d4x: license problem Changed Bug title to 'RM: d4x

Re: RM: d4x -- RoQA; non-free

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:31:49PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > reassign 569648 ftp.debian.org > retitle 569648 RM: d4x -- RoQA; non-free > affects 569648 + d4x > thanks Given that popcon of the package is still quite high, I believe a QA upload to non-free would have been a better first move (a