Processed: close 485569

2009-11-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 485569 Bug#485569: libhk-classes-dev: python 2.4/2.5 dependency 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Laurent Bonnaud > thanks Stopping processing here. Plea

Bug#485569: libhk-classes-dev: python 2.4/2.5 dependency

2009-11-30 Thread Laurent Bonnaud
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 21:14 +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > > they got rebuilt against python2.5 (and they will be recompiled > against 2.6 once > it hits unstable) so I think this bug doesn't apply anymore, what do > you think? Indeed. I am going to close this bug... Thanks for the reminder

Пoчтoвaя kомaния

2009-11-30 Thread ГЕРМАН Алексеевич
Горящие Pассылки по e-майл! {vlad1oplaty} (495)5 8562 89 38-37-671-14 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#521107: s-p-u: security update for xfs package

2009-11-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 01:25 -0300, Luciano Bello wrote: > El Mar 17 Nov 2009, Adam D. Barratt escribió: > > >From a stable-update point-of-view, I'd also prefer that it was fixed in > > > > unstable first. It's a lot easier to fix sid if any unforeseen problems > > arise. :) > > So, I made the QA

Bug#558868: Resolve unresolved symbols in shared libraries

2009-11-30 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Source: iterm Version: 0.5-7 Severity: wishlist User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in a specific library package so othe

Bug#558859: Resolve unresolved symbols in shared libraries

2009-11-30 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Source: g2 Version: 0.72-1 Severity: wishlist User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in a specific library package so other

Bug#558882: Resolve unresolved symbols in shared libraries

2009-11-30 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Source: libdockapp Version: 1:0.5.0-3 Severity: wishlist User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in a specific library packag

Bug#558869: Resolve unresolved symbols in shared libraries

2009-11-30 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Source: knoda Version: 0.8.3-3 Severity: wishlist User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in a specific library package so ot

Bug#558899: Resolve unresolved symbols in shared libraries

2009-11-30 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Source: libiphone Version: 0.9.1-4 Severity: wishlist User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in a specific library package s

Bug#558932: Resolve unresolved symbols in shared libraries

2009-11-30 Thread Peter Fritzsche
Source: lineakd Version: 1:0.9-6 Severity: wishlist User: peter.fritzs...@gmx.de Usertags: unresolved-symbols-so I build all packages some time ago with binutils-gold and your package build without an hard failure, but I noticed that you seems to provide a library in a specific library package so