Processed: Bug#493702: bot fixed in tla 1.3.5+dfsg-13

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 493702 1.3.5+dfsg-13 Bug#493702: tla(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts Bug marked as found in version 1.3.5+dfsg-13 and reopened. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syst

Processed: Bug#404248: not fixed in apollon 1.0.2.1-3

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 404248 1.0.2.1-3 Bug#404248: apollon(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts Bug marked as found in version 1.0.2.1-3 and reopened. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system a

Bug#493702: bot fixed in tla 1.3.5+dfsg-13

found 493702 1.3.5+dfsg-13 thanks Hello (Aurelien), unfortunately #493702 is not fixed, The 06-relibtoolize.dpatch is not included in debian/patches/00list, therefore it is not applied during build. Petr tla (1.3.5+dfsg-13) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * debian/patches/06-reli

Bug#404248: not fixed in apollon 1.0.2.1-3

found 404248 1.0.2.1-3 thanks Hi (Aurelien), the admin/libtool.m4.in have not been updated, libtool still does not support GNU/kFreeBSD. Petr http://buildd.debian-ports.org/fetch.php?pkg=apollon&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=1.0.2.1-3&stamp=1218760637&file=log&as=raw checking how to recognise depe

fonty REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the fonty source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0-23.7 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files.

Bug#404248: marked as done (apollon(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts)

Your message dated Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#404248: fixed in apollon 1.0.2.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #404248, regarding apollon(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date libtool scripts to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: RC Bugs that don't affect etch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # According to the version information these bugs > # affect the stable release, but for one reason or > # another that is not actually true. > # > # Mark them as lenny,sid as discussed on debian-release > # See http://lists.debian.org/debian-releas

Processed: found 441913 in 6.revised-3.1, found 441914 in 20001107-a-3.1, found 441915 in 1.0.0-5.1 ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > # add version numbers so they dont get falsely assigned to etch > found 441913 6.revised-3.1 Bug#441913: buggy dict-* invoke-rc.d fixes Bug marked as found in version 6.revised-3.1.

Bug#441914: found 441913 in 6.revised-3.1, found 441914 in 20001107-a-3.1, found 441915 in 1.0.0-5.1 ...

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # add version numbers so they dont get falsely assigned to etch found 441913 6.revised-3.1 found 441914 20001107-a-3.1 found 441915 1.0.0-5.1 found 441916 0.48-4.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Processed: RC bugs that don't affect etch (2)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # According to the version information these bugs > # affect the stable release, but for one reason or > # another that is not actually true. > # > # Mark them as lenny,sid as discussed on debian-release > # See http://lists.debian.org/debian-releas

Bug#495308: bfr: man page contains POD errors

Package: bfr Version: 1.6-2 Severity: normal bfr(1) ends with POD ERRORS. > POD ERRORS >Hey! The above document had some coding errors, which are explained > below: > >Around line 179: >You forgot a '=back' before '=head2' > >Around line 181: >'=