Can't beat this stock

T he US stock is going. This could translate to over 24 Mliloin more in sales an.d will enable the company to bring sharehold values to over 1000%. TBCO.pk Will make you very rich. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1_amd64.changes

libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1.dsc libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012.orig.tar.gz libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1.diff.gz libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue d

libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libm/libmath-basecalc-perl/libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1.diff.gz libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1.dsc to pool/main/libm/libmath-basecalc-perl/libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1.dsc libmath-basecalc-perl_1.012-1_all.deb to pool/main/libm/li

Bug#461455: marked as done (curlftpfs: first reading of file overwrites username and password)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#461455: fixed in curlftpfs 0.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #461455, regarding curlftpfs: first reading of file overwrites username and password to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#449207: marked as done (curlftpfs: Seg fault on exit)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#449207: fixed in curlftpfs 0.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #449207, regarding curlftpfs: Seg fault on exit to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#480320: marked as done (curlftpfs: Segfault mounting Kerberos server)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#480320: fixed in curlftpfs 0.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #480320, regarding curlftpfs: Segfault mounting Kerberos server to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

vgrind REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the vgrind source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 8.1+20050830-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Package not in unstable The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint

Processing of mp3wrap_0.5-3_i386.changes

mp3wrap_0.5-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mp3wrap_0.5-3.dsc mp3wrap_0.5-3.diff.gz mp3wrap_0.5-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

mp3wrap_0.5-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: mp3wrap_0.5-3.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mp3wrap/mp3wrap_0.5-3.diff.gz mp3wrap_0.5-3.dsc to pool/main/m/mp3wrap/mp3wrap_0.5-3.dsc mp3wrap_0.5-3_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mp3wrap/mp3wrap_0.5-3_i386.deb Override entries for your package: mp3wrap_0.5-3.dsc - source sound mp3wrap_0.5-3_i38

Bug#493717: marked as done (debian/watch file for mp3wrap)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:49:17 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#493717: fixed in mp3wrap 0.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #493717, regarding debian/watch file for mp3wrap to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#494734: adesklets broken because of --enable-debug switch

Package: adesklets Version: 0.6.1-3 Severity: important Recently updated adesklets 0.6.1-3 binary builds are broken out of the box for most normal uses, because they were compiled with special purpose --enable-debug configure switch. From adesklets_0.6.1-3.diff.gz (debian/rules): +./configur

Processing of adesklets_0.6.1-4_i386.changes

adesklets_0.6.1-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: adesklets_0.6.1-4.dsc adesklets_0.6.1-4.diff.gz adesklets_0.6.1-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

adesklets_0.6.1-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: adesklets_0.6.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/a/adesklets/adesklets_0.6.1-4.diff.gz adesklets_0.6.1-4.dsc to pool/main/a/adesklets/adesklets_0.6.1-4.dsc adesklets_0.6.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/adesklets/adesklets_0.6.1-4_i386.deb Override entries for your package: adesklets_0.6.1-4.ds

Bug#494734: marked as done (adesklets broken because of --enable-debug switch)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494734: fixed in adesklets 0.6.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #494734, regarding adesklets broken because of --enable-debug switch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#372652: marked as done (diff for 0.1.14-6.2 NMU)

Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:27:20 -0300 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Ack NMU has caused the Debian Bug report #372652, regarding diff for 0.1.14-6.2 NMU to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processing of gnuift_0.1.14-8_i386.changes

gnuift_0.1.14-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnuift_0.1.14-8.dsc gnuift_0.1.14-8.diff.gz gnuift-doc_0.1.14-8_all.deb gnuift-perl_0.1.14-8_all.deb gnuift_0.1.14-8_i386.deb libgnuift0c2a_0.1.14-8_i386.deb libgnuift0-dev_0.1.14-8_i386.deb libmrm

gnuift_0.1.14-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gnuift-doc_0.1.14-8_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift-doc_0.1.14-8_all.deb gnuift-perl_0.1.14-8_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift-perl_0.1.14-8_all.deb gnuift_0.1.14-8.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1.14-8.diff.gz gnuift_0.1.14-8.dsc to pool/main/g/gnuift/gnuift_0.1

Bug#435943: marked as done (gnuift: not binNMU safe)

Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:17:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#435943: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #435943, regarding gnuift: not binNMU safe to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#398503: marked as done (Shouldn't build depend on an unversioned automake)

Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:17:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#398503: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #398503, regarding Shouldn't build depend on an unversioned automake to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#481052: marked as done (gnuift: circular dependency with gnuift-perl)

Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:17:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#481052: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #481052, regarding gnuift: circular dependency with gnuift-perl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#494233: marked as done (gnuift: FTBFS: perl-compile-test-program.cc:71: error: 'my_perl' was not declared in this scope)

Your message dated Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:17:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494233: fixed in gnuift 0.1.14-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #494233, regarding gnuift: FTBFS: perl-compile-test-program.cc:71: error: 'my_perl' was not declared in this scope to be ma