Processing of htdig_3.2.0b6-5_i386.changes

htdig_3.2.0b6-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: htdig_3.2.0b6-5.dsc htdig_3.2.0b6-5.diff.gz htdig-doc_3.2.0b6-5_all.deb htdig_3.2.0b6-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

htdig_3.2.0b6-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: htdig-doc_3.2.0b6-5_all.deb to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig-doc_3.2.0b6-5_all.deb htdig_3.2.0b6-5.diff.gz to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig_3.2.0b6-5.diff.gz htdig_3.2.0b6-5.dsc to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig_3.2.0b6-5.dsc htdig_3.2.0b6-5_i386.deb to pool/main/h/htdig/htdig_3.2.0b6-5_i386.deb

Bug#462380: marked as done (htdig: [INTL:vi] Vietnamese debconf templates translation update)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#462380: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#463726: marked as done (htdig: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation update)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#463726: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#462684: marked as done ([INTL:fi] Finnish translation of the debconf templates)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#462684: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#464119: marked as done (: French debconf templates translation)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#464119: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#461748: marked as done ([INTL:gl] Galician debconf template translation for htdig)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#461748: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#461941: marked as done (htdig: [INTL:ja] Updated Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po))

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#461941: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#462797: marked as done (nb translation for htdig debconf)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#462797: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#464038: marked as done ([l10n] Updated Czech translation of htdig debconf messages)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#464038: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#462806: marked as done (htdig: [INTL:de] updated German debconf translation)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#462806: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#463960: marked as done (htdig: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation for debconf messages)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#463960: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#461014: marked as done (htdig: [debconf_rewrite] Debconf templates and debian/control review)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#461014: fixed in htdig 1:3.2.0b6-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#461395: Does not remove ifplugd.hotplug on package upgrades

Thank you for the report and the tip to fix this Michael. I am in the process of updating the ifplugd package quite a bit, I'll make sure that this is taken care of in the next upload. Giridhar On 08/01/18 10:56 +0100, Michael Biebl said ... > today I found that I had a file /etc/hotplug.d/net/i

Processing of quiteinsane_0.10-14_i386.changes

quiteinsane_0.10-14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: quiteinsane_0.10-14.dsc quiteinsane_0.10-14.diff.gz quiteinsane_0.10-14_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

quiteinsane_0.10-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: quiteinsane_0.10-14.diff.gz to pool/main/q/quiteinsane/quiteinsane_0.10-14.diff.gz quiteinsane_0.10-14.dsc to pool/main/q/quiteinsane/quiteinsane_0.10-14.dsc quiteinsane_0.10-14_i386.deb to pool/main/q/quiteinsane/quiteinsane_0.10-14_i386.deb Override entries for your package: qu

Bug#464816: marked as done (quiteinsane: Build depends on ancient libqt3-compat-headers)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 13:47:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#464816: fixed in quiteinsane 0.10-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processing of ksimus_0.3.6-2-14_i386.changes

ksimus_0.3.6-2-14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ksimus_0.3.6-2-14.dsc ksimus_0.3.6-2-14.diff.gz ksimus-dev_0.3.6-2-14_all.deb ksimus_0.3.6-2-14_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

ksimus_0.3.6-2-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: ksimus-dev_0.3.6-2-14_all.deb to pool/main/k/ksimus/ksimus-dev_0.3.6-2-14_all.deb ksimus_0.3.6-2-14.diff.gz to pool/main/k/ksimus/ksimus_0.3.6-2-14.diff.gz ksimus_0.3.6-2-14.dsc to pool/main/k/ksimus/ksimus_0.3.6-2-14.dsc ksimus_0.3.6-2-14_i386.deb to pool/main/k/ksimus/ksimus_0.

Bug#464892: debpartial: Hard Links / DVD-DL, BlueRay,...

Package: debpartial Version: 0+20030508.1 Severity: wishlist Hi, would be nice if debpartial would also support - hard links (currently symlinks and copying only) - aliases for double layer DVDs, Blue Ray disks, HDDVD regards -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unst

Bug#463089: marked as done (libqt-perl: missing perlapi-5.8.x dependency)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#463089: fixed in libqt-perl 3.008-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#464860: quiteinsanegimpplugins: Build depends on ancient libqt3-compat-headers

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 464860 quiteinsanegimpplugin Bug#464860: quiteinsanegimpplugins: Build depends on ancient libqt3-compat-headers Warning: Unknown package 'quiteinsanegimpplugins' Bug reassigned from package `quiteinsanegimpplugins' to `quiteinsanegimpplugin'.

Bug#464916: ksocrat: Build depends on ancient libqt3-compat-headers

Package: ksocrat Version: 3.2.1-1 Severity: normal User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertag: libqt3-compat-headers Hi, We are currently attempting to remove the antiquated libqt3-compat-headers from the archive. Since this package is orphaned, I will do a QA upload to fix this issue. Thank you, Barry

Processing of vipec_3.2.0-5_i386.changes

vipec_3.2.0-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: vipec_3.2.0-5.dsc vipec_3.2.0-5.diff.gz vipec_3.2.0-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Processing of ksocrat_3.2.1-2_i386.changes

ksocrat_3.2.1-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ksocrat_3.2.1-2.dsc ksocrat_3.2.1-2.diff.gz ksocrat_3.2.1-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Bug#464916: marked as done (ksocrat: Build depends on ancient libqt3-compat-headers)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:17:11 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#464916: fixed in ksocrat 3.2.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#367967: marked as done (vipec: please include .desktop file)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:17:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367967: fixed in vipec 3.2.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

ksocrat_3.2.1-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: ksocrat_3.2.1-2.diff.gz to pool/contrib/k/ksocrat/ksocrat_3.2.1-2.diff.gz ksocrat_3.2.1-2.dsc to pool/contrib/k/ksocrat/ksocrat_3.2.1-2.dsc ksocrat_3.2.1-2_i386.deb to pool/contrib/k/ksocrat/ksocrat_3.2.1-2_i386.deb Override entries for your package: ksocrat_3.2.1-2.dsc - source

vipec_3.2.0-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: vipec_3.2.0-5.diff.gz to pool/main/v/vipec/vipec_3.2.0-5.diff.gz vipec_3.2.0-5.dsc to pool/main/v/vipec/vipec_3.2.0-5.dsc vipec_3.2.0-5_i386.deb to pool/main/v/vipec/vipec_3.2.0-5_i386.deb Override entries for your package: vipec_3.2.0-5.dsc - source electronics vipec_3.2.0-5_i38

Bug#449931: marked as done (vipec: debian/watch fails to report upstream's version)

Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2008 22:17:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#449931: fixed in vipec 3.2.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2 2.2.1-4 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 2.2.1-4 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ fo