Hello,
That you mention in this bug, I have been check on upstream source and
found that the strip parameter is set in the
Make.common.in.
After make a contact to the developer, he will update this issue and I will
follow the new upstream source and
preparing to build the package and recover it
Hi!
Is there a further update on this bug? Could you get it fixed and
adopted?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
workbone_2.40-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
workbone_2.40-8.dsc
workbone_2.40-8.diff.gz
workbone_2.40-8_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Accepted:
workbone_2.40-8.diff.gz
to pool/main/w/workbone/workbone_2.40-8.diff.gz
workbone_2.40-8.dsc
to pool/main/w/workbone/workbone_2.40-8.dsc
workbone_2.40-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/w/workbone/workbone_2.40-8_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
workbone_2.40-8.dsc - source sound
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:47:31 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427592: fixed in workbone 2.40-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Tags: moreinfo unreproducible
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Here's what I get:
spfqtool -d 255 -e 1 -i 1.2.3.4 -h mail.example.com -s [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SPF Query Tool v0.4 - James Couzens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[DEBUG]: Debugging level:255
[DEBUG]: RFC2821 Mail From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[DEBUG]: RFC2821 HELO: mail.example.com
[DEBUG]: Purported addre
libspf_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libspf_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1.dsc
libspf_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg.orig.tar.gz
libspf_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1.diff.gz
libspf-doc_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1_all.deb
libspf-dev_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1_i386.de
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
My sponsor is quite bissy, I'm just waiting for now :-/
Hi!
Is there a further update on this bug? Could you get it fixed and
adopted?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
-
Accepted:
libspf-dev_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libs/libspf/libspf-dev_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1_i386.deb
libspf-doc_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1_all.deb
to pool/main/libs/libspf/libspf-doc_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1_all.deb
libspf0_0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libs/libspf/li
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393389: fixed in libspf 0.999-1.0.0-p3.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
FYI: The status of the ldaptor source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.0.43-0.5
Current version: 0.0.43-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the flowscan source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.006-11
Current version: 1.006-12
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
13 matches
Mail list logo