Bug#448587: marked as done (xmp new version available)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:47:14 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#448587: fixed in xmp 2.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#396410: marked as done (grdesktop eats all memory and freezes the whole system)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:46:30 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing at request of submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Processed: some changes

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package ecawave Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ecawave > submitter 249229 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#249229: ecawave: copying a shorter buffer doesn't truncate clipboard.wav Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > severity 24922

Bug#138925: marked as done (iswedish: Don't accept hej)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:15:55 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line This bug no longer exists has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsi

Processed: severity

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package grdesktop Ignoring bugs not assigned to: grdesktop > severity 385211 wishlist Bug#385211: grdesktop: SSH tunnel options does not work as expected. Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me i

Bug#390123: Reproducible crash changing keyboard language code

2007-11-12 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
package grdesktop title 390123 grdesktop: changing keyboard language code causes SIGSEGV thanks I rebuilt grdesktop with debugging symbols and have included the backtrace: gdb /usr/bin/grdesktop GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered

Processed: retitle

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package grdesktop Ignoring bugs not assigned to: grdesktop > retitle 390123 grdesktop: changing keyboard language code causes SIGSEGV Bug#390123: Reproducible crash changing keyboard language code Changed Bug title to `grdesktop: changing keyboard lang

Bug#450945: mydns: new upstream with new version may solve memory problems

2007-11-12 Thread MJ Ray
Package: mydns-pgsql Version: 1:1.1.0-7 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, I was having some problems with mydns-pgsql 1:1.1.0-7 running under OpenVZ hitting various memory limits. While trying to debug it, I've tried installing the new version 1.2.4 which may be a fork, see http://sourceforge.n

Bug#450994: [INTL:nl] Dutch po-debconf translation

2007-11-12 Thread cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
Package: x10 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Please find attached the dutch po-debconf translation. Please add it to your next package revision, it should be inserted in your package build-tree as debian/po/nl.po, TIA. Feel free to mail me if this file needs updating at some future date. --

Bug#449716: marked as done (xxdiff: debian/watch fails to report upstream's version)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:02:13 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#449716: fixed in xxdiff 1:3.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processing of oaf_0.6.10-9_i386.changes

2007-11-12 Thread Archive Administrator
oaf_0.6.10-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: oaf_0.6.10-9.dsc oaf_0.6.10-9.diff.gz oaf_0.6.10-9_i386.deb liboaf0_0.6.10-9_i386.deb liboaf-dev_0.6.10-9_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

oaf_0.6.10-9_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: liboaf-dev_0.6.10-9_i386.deb to pool/main/o/oaf/liboaf-dev_0.6.10-9_i386.deb liboaf0_0.6.10-9_i386.deb to pool/main/o/oaf/liboaf0_0.6.10-9_i386.deb oaf_0.6.10-9.diff.gz to pool/main/o/oaf/oaf_0.6.10-9.diff.gz oaf_0.6.10-9.dsc to pool/main/o/oaf/oaf_0.6.10-9.dsc oaf_0.6.10-9_i386.

Bug#356907: marked as done (oaf: Remove duplicate ldconfig)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356907: fixed in oaf 0.6.10-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#418290: marked as done (underquoted aclocal m4 file)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#418290: fixed in oaf 0.6.10-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#87107: marked as done (liboaf0: missing manpages)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#87107: fixed in oaf 0.6.10-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#262471: marked as done (oaf: man page missing for oaf-client)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#262471: fixed in oaf 0.6.10-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processing of ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3_i386.changes

2007-11-12 Thread Archive Administrator
ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.dsc ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.diff.gz ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.diff.gz to pool/main/l/ld.so.preload-manager/ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.diff.gz ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.dsc to pool/main/l/ld.so.preload-manager/ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.dsc ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3_all.deb to pool/main/l/ld.so.prelo

Bug#133984: marked as done (ld.so.preload-manager: Please improve the description)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 02:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#133984: fixed in ld.so.preload-manager 0.3.3-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#451062: rscheme: lintian error, orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders

2007-11-12 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: rscheme Severity: minor Usertags: orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders Hello, While checking the list generated by lintian about the orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders error[1] I've noticed rscheme is listed. Quoting the same page: "Packages with their maintainer set to [E

Bug#451063: scheme48: lintian error, orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders

2007-11-12 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: scheme48 Severity: minor Usertags: orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders Hello, While checking the list generated by lintian about the orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders error[1] I've noticed scheme48 is listed. Quoting the same page: "Packages with their maintainer set to

Bug#451066: netcdf: lintian error, orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders

2007-11-12 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: netcdf Severity: minor Usertags: orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders Hello, While checking the list generated by lintian about the orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders error[1] I've noticed netcdf is listed. Quoting the same page: "Packages with their maintainer set to [EMA

Bug#451059: newbiedoc: lintian error, debian-files-list-in-source

2007-11-12 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: newbiedoc Severity: minor Hello, While checking the list generated by lintian about the debian-files-list-in-source error[1] I've noticed newbiedoc is listed. Quoting the same page: "Leaving debian/files causes problems for the autobuilders, since that file will likely include the list

Processed: Re: xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 312328 > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1210548&group_id=2198&atid=102198 Bug#312328: xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory Forwarded-to-address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to https://s

Bug#312328: marked as done (xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:43:15 +0530 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Processed: Re: xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 312328 +upstream Bug#312328: xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > tags 312328 +fixed-upstream Bug#312328: xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory Tag

Processed: Tagging upstream bugs as such

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 135867 +upstream Bug#135867: xxdiff: can't really compare UTF-8 There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > tags 387604 +upstream Bug#387604: xxdiff cuts off characters in the rightmost column There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > tag

Bug#306011: marked as done (segmentation fault when try to run xxdiff for given options)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:55:42 +0530 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306011: segmentation fault when try to run xxdiff for given options has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#254567: marked as done (xxdiff: segfault on any popup from menubar)

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:04:42 +0530 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#254567: xxdiff: segfault on any popup from menubar has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Re: Bug#254567: xxdiff: segfault on any popup from menubar

2007-11-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 254567 +moreinfo Bug#254567: xxdiff: segfault on any popup from menubar Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis