Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:47:14 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#448587: fixed in xmp 2.4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:46:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing at request of submitter
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package ecawave
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ecawave
> submitter 249229 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#249229: ecawave: copying a shorter buffer doesn't truncate clipboard.wav
Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> severity 24922
Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:15:55 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug no longer exists
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package grdesktop
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: grdesktop
> severity 385211 wishlist
Bug#385211: grdesktop: SSH tunnel options does not work as expected.
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
package grdesktop
title 390123 grdesktop: changing keyboard language code causes SIGSEGV
thanks
I rebuilt grdesktop with debugging symbols and have included the
backtrace:
gdb /usr/bin/grdesktop
GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package grdesktop
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: grdesktop
> retitle 390123 grdesktop: changing keyboard language code causes SIGSEGV
Bug#390123: Reproducible crash changing keyboard language code
Changed Bug title to `grdesktop: changing keyboard lang
Package: mydns-pgsql
Version: 1:1.1.0-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I was having some problems with mydns-pgsql 1:1.1.0-7 running under
OpenVZ hitting various memory limits. While trying to debug it, I've
tried installing the new version 1.2.4 which may be a fork, see
http://sourceforge.n
Package: x10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find attached the dutch po-debconf translation. Please add
it to your next package revision, it should be inserted in your package
build-tree as debian/po/nl.po, TIA.
Feel free to mail me if this file needs updating at some future date.
--
Your message dated Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#449716: fixed in xxdiff 1:3.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
oaf_0.6.10-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
oaf_0.6.10-9.dsc
oaf_0.6.10-9.diff.gz
oaf_0.6.10-9_i386.deb
liboaf0_0.6.10-9_i386.deb
liboaf-dev_0.6.10-9_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
Accepted:
liboaf-dev_0.6.10-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/oaf/liboaf-dev_0.6.10-9_i386.deb
liboaf0_0.6.10-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/oaf/liboaf0_0.6.10-9_i386.deb
oaf_0.6.10-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/oaf/oaf_0.6.10-9.diff.gz
oaf_0.6.10-9.dsc
to pool/main/o/oaf/oaf_0.6.10-9.dsc
oaf_0.6.10-9_i386.
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356907: fixed in oaf 0.6.10-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418290: fixed in oaf 0.6.10-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#87107: fixed in oaf 0.6.10-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#262471: fixed in oaf 0.6.10-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.dsc
ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.diff.gz
ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/ld.so.preload-manager/ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.diff.gz
ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.dsc
to pool/main/l/ld.so.preload-manager/ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3.dsc
ld.so.preload-manager_0.3.3-3_all.deb
to pool/main/l/ld.so.prelo
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 02:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#133984: fixed in ld.so.preload-manager 0.3.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Package: rscheme
Severity: minor
Usertags: orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders
Hello,
While checking the list generated by lintian about the
orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders error[1] I've noticed
rscheme is listed.
Quoting the same page: "Packages with their maintainer set to
[E
Package: scheme48
Severity: minor
Usertags: orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders
Hello,
While checking the list generated by lintian about the
orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders error[1] I've noticed
scheme48 is listed.
Quoting the same page: "Packages with their maintainer set to
Package: netcdf
Severity: minor
Usertags: orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders
Hello,
While checking the list generated by lintian about the
orphaned-package-should-not-have-uploaders error[1] I've noticed
netcdf is listed.
Quoting the same page: "Packages with their maintainer set to
[EMA
Package: newbiedoc
Severity: minor
Hello,
While checking the list generated by lintian about the
debian-files-list-in-source error[1] I've noticed newbiedoc is
listed.
Quoting the same page: "Leaving debian/files causes problems for the
autobuilders, since that file will likely include the list
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 312328
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1210548&group_id=2198&atid=102198
Bug#312328: xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory
Forwarded-to-address changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
https://s
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:43:15 +0530
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 312328 +upstream
Bug#312328: xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tags 312328 +fixed-upstream
Bug#312328: xxdiff: 'copy file' in recursive diff copies to wrong directory
Tag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 135867 +upstream
Bug#135867: xxdiff: can't really compare UTF-8
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tags 387604 +upstream
Bug#387604: xxdiff cuts off characters in the rightmost column
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tag
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:55:42 +0530
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306011: segmentation fault when try to run xxdiff for
given options
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:04:42 +0530
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#254567: xxdiff: segfault on any popup from menubar
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 254567 +moreinfo
Bug#254567: xxdiff: segfault on any popup from menubar
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
30 matches
Mail list logo