Processing of bfr_1.6-1_amd64.changes

2007-06-19 Thread Archive Administrator
bfr_1.6-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: bfr_1.6-1.dsc bfr_1.6.orig.tar.gz bfr_1.6-1.diff.gz bfr_1.6-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

bfr_1.6-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Installer
Warning: ignoring bfr_1.6.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive. Accepted: bfr_1.6-1.diff.gz to pool/main/b/bfr/bfr_1.6-1.diff.gz bfr_1.6-1.dsc to pool/main/b/bfr/bfr_1.6-1.dsc bfr_1.6-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/b/bfr/bfr_1.6-1_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: bfr_1.6-1.

Processing of libapache-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4_amd64.changes

2007-06-19 Thread Archive Administrator
libapache-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libapache-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4.dsc libapache-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4.diff.gz libapache2-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

libapache-mod-auth-mysql override disparity

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libapache2-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4_amd64.deb: package says section is web, override says net. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct an

libapache-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libapache-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libapache-mod-auth-mysql/libapache-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4.diff.gz libapache-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4.dsc to pool/main/liba/libapache-mod-auth-mysql/libapache-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4.dsc libapache2-mod-auth-mysql_4.3.9-4_amd64.

Processing of labrea_2.5-stable-2_i386.changes

2007-06-19 Thread Archive Administrator
labrea_2.5-stable-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: labrea_2.5-stable-2.dsc labrea_2.5-stable-2.diff.gz labrea_2.5-stable-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

labrea_2.5-stable-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: labrea_2.5-stable-2.diff.gz to pool/main/l/labrea/labrea_2.5-stable-2.diff.gz labrea_2.5-stable-2.dsc to pool/main/l/labrea/labrea_2.5-stable-2.dsc labrea_2.5-stable-2_i386.deb to pool/main/l/labrea/labrea_2.5-stable-2_i386.deb Override entries for your package: labrea_2.5-stable

Bug#429104: marked as done (please update/request removal of your package)

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#429104: fixed in libapache-mod-auth-mysql 4.3.9-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#427198: binNMU for vflib3 due to #426006

2007-06-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:08:06AM +0100, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > >No other packages seem to be affected. > >But I don't know why vflib3 needed rebuilt either, it doesn't seem to > >contain any .la files? > Maybe a confusion between source and binary package names? No, an ex

Bug#427198: binNMU for vflib3 due to #426006

2007-06-19 Thread Lior Kaplan
Steve Langasek wrote: No other packages seem to be affected. But I don't know why vflib3 needed rebuilt either, it doesn't seem to contain any .la files? Maybe a confusion between source and binary package names? $ dpkg -S /usr/lib/libVFlib3.la vflib3-dev: /usr/lib/libVFlib3.la Might be a go

Processing of gsmartcard_0.1.5-5_amd64.changes

2007-06-19 Thread Archive Administrator
gsmartcard_0.1.5-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gsmartcard_0.1.5-5.dsc gsmartcard_0.1.5-5.diff.gz gsmartcard_0.1.5-5_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

gsmartcard_0.1.5-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gsmartcard_0.1.5-5.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gsmartcard/gsmartcard_0.1.5-5.diff.gz gsmartcard_0.1.5-5.dsc to pool/main/g/gsmartcard/gsmartcard_0.1.5-5.dsc gsmartcard_0.1.5-5_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gsmartcard/gsmartcard_0.1.5-5_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: gsmartcar

Processing of gtktalog_1.0.4-5_amd64.changes

2007-06-19 Thread Archive Administrator
gtktalog_1.0.4-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gtktalog_1.0.4-5.dsc gtktalog_1.0.4-5.diff.gz gtktalog_1.0.4-5_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Bug#424378: marked as done (gsmartcard: FTBFS if built twice in a row)

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424378: fixed in gsmartcard 0.1.5-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

gtktalog_1.0.4-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gtktalog_1.0.4-5.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-5.diff.gz gtktalog_1.0.4-5.dsc to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-5.dsc gtktalog_1.0.4-5_amd64.deb to pool/main/g/gtktalog/gtktalog_1.0.4-5_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: gtktalog_1.0.4-5.dsc - sour

Processed: Re: CIPE is abandoned upstream, icompatible with all unstable kernels, low popcon and obsoleted by openvpn

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 428977 normal Bug#428977: CIPE is abandoned upstream, icompatible with all unstable kernels, low popcon and obsoleted by openvpn Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > reassign 428977 ftp.debian.org Bug#428977: CIPE is abandoned upstream, ic

Bug#424394: marked as done (gtktalog: FTBFS if built twice in a row)

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424394: fixed in gtktalog 1:1.0.4-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#320363: RM: libapache-miniwiki-perl -- RoQA; orphaned, doesn't work with Apache 2

2007-06-19 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 400362 RM: libapache-miniwiki-perl -- RoQA; orphaned, doesn't work with Apache 2 reassign 400362 ftp.debian.org thanks Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Due to the recent removal of apache (including it's accompanied > packages of apache-common, apache-dbg, apache-dev, apache

Bug#428977: CIPE is abandoned upstream, icompatible with all unstable kernels, low popcon and obsoleted by openvpn

2007-06-19 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
severity 428977 normal reassign 428977 ftp.debian.org retitle 428977 RoM: cipe-source, cipe-common, pkcipe -- RoM; Orphaned, dead upstream, does not work with any debian kernel, low popcon, obsoleted by openvpn thanks hi On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:17:00PM +0200, Marco Nenciarini wrote: > The cip

Processing of conquest_8.2b-1_all.changes

2007-06-19 Thread Archive Administrator
conquest_8.2b-1_all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: conquest_8.2b-1.dsc conquest_8.2b.orig.tar.gz conquest_8.2b-1.diff.gz conquest-data_8.2b-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

conquest_8.2b-1_all.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: conquest-data_8.2b-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/conquest/conquest-data_8.2b-1_all.deb conquest_8.2b-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/conquest/conquest_8.2b-1.diff.gz conquest_8.2b-1.dsc to pool/main/c/conquest/conquest_8.2b-1.dsc conquest_8.2b.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/conquest/conquest_8.2

Bug#424160: marked as done (conquest: FTBFS if built twice in a row)

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:02:50 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424160: fixed in conquest 8.2b-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#429698: wmacpi: new upstream URL

2007-06-19 Thread Matej Vela
Package: wmacpi Version: 2.1-9 Severity: minor The URL listed in debian/copyright, , no longer works. It seems to have moved to . Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#343396: marked as done (oleo: please rebuild against libxdb1)

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:06:12 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of oleo 1.99.16-8.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#380756: marked as done (Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !)

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:11:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of adonthell 0.3.4.cvs.20050813-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#322838: marked as done (wmcalc: please remove /usr/doc symlink)

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:14:33 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of wmcalc 0.3-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#382202: marked as done (adonthell: don't include your copy of sdl_ttf and build-dep on libsdl-ttf2.0-dev instead)

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:11:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of adonthell 0.3.4.cvs.20050813-2.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Processed: Bug#417531: elisp-manual: please move to /usr/share/info/emacs-21

2007-06-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 417531 elisp-manual: please move to /usr/share/info/emacs-21 Bug#417531: emacs-snapshot: snapshot vs elisp-manual package Changed Bug title to `elisp-manual: please move to /usr/share/info/emacs-21' from `emacs-snapshot: snapshot vs elisp-manua

Bug#417531: elisp-manual: please move to /usr/share/info/emacs-21

2007-06-19 Thread Matej Vela
retitle 417531 elisp-manual: please move to /usr/share/info/emacs-21 severity 417531 wishlist thanks This is less important now that emacs-snapshot is gone (#417412), though it might be resurrected (#429577). Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub