Processing of hdf5_1.6.5-4_i386.changes

hdf5_1.6.5-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: hdf5_1.6.5-4.dsc hdf5_1.6.5-4.diff.gz libhdf5-doc_1.6.5-4_all.deb libhdf5-serial-1.6.5-0_1.6.5-4_i386.deb libhdf5-serial-dev_1.6.5-4_i386.deb libhdf5-lam-1.6.5-0_1.6.5-4_i386.deb libhdf5-lam-dev_1.6.5-4

hdf5_1.6.5-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: hdf5-tools_1.6.5-4_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5-tools_1.6.5-4_i386.deb hdf5_1.6.5-4.diff.gz to pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.6.5-4.diff.gz hdf5_1.6.5-4.dsc to pool/main/h/hdf5/hdf5_1.6.5-4.dsc libhdf5-doc_1.6.5-4_all.deb to pool/main/h/hdf5/libhdf5-doc_1.6.5-4_all.deb libhdf5-lam-

Bug#417234: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes)

Your message dated Mon, 14 May 2007 15:32:10 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#417234: fixed in hdf5 1.6.5-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#226530: marked as done (tex-guy: implicitly declared function returns a pointer that is used)

Your message dated Mon, 14 May 2007 09:39:42 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Please test your reported bug of tex-guy with the new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#318711: marked as done ([Fwd: Log for successful build of tex-guy_1.2.4-4.1 (dist=unstable)])

Your message dated Mon, 14 May 2007 09:39:42 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Please test your reported bug of tex-guy with the new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#318711: Please test your reported bug of tex-guy with the new version

Version: 1.3.2-1 On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:07:36PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello All, > > I'm contacting you as you have open bugs against tex-guy package. > > I've uploaded a new version of tex-guy to debian unstable (version 1.3.2). >

Nouveau: Visualisez les Chaussures en 360° !

NOUVEAU ! Visualisez les chaussures à 360° Chaussures filles http://emailing.vertbaudet.fr/cgi-bin2/DM/y/mkki0K4Ebf0QCr0Blfg0F7 Chaussures garçons http://emailing.vertbaudet.fr/cgi-bin2/DM/y/mkki0K4Ebf0QCr0Blfh0F8 Chaussures bébés http://emailing.vertbaudet.fr/cgi-bin2/DM/y/mkki0K4Ebf0QCr0Blf

kiss REMOVED from testing

FYI: The status of the kiss source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.21-13 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: # 20070513 Bug #407426: RM: kiss -- RoM The script that generates this mail tr

Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 209570 pending Bug#209570: The package description does not follow Debian policy There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 387775 pending Bug#387775: ITA: libhdf4 -- The Hierarchica

Bug#422605: [Patch] #422605 caused by gcjh being replaced by gjavah in gcj >= 4.2

tag 422605 patch thanks The folowwing patch takes care of the rename and tightens build-depends to make sure the replacement is caught. BTW, since this builds entirely with free tools, it might be possible to build it in all arches, instead of only i386 and amd64 (it seems to be blocked by the au

Processed: [Patch] #422605 caused by gcjh being replaced by gjavah in gcj >= 4.2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 422605 patch Bug#422605: FTBFS: debian/make-libnbio.sh: line 78: /usr/bin/gcjh: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking