Hi!
I've resolved the problem by modifying the sources. Please find attached
the patch.
The modified version is now running for more than two weeks and the
reported problem has not reappeared.
Bye
Hansi
--- libapache-mod-auth-mysql-4.3.9/mod_auth_mysql.c.ori 2007-04-20 10:29:27.0 +020
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 388015 by 416391
Bug#416391: txt2man: ends up with visible \fB in front of the first hing that
looks like a command-line option on a line
Bug#388015: groach: redundand "\" in manual page breaks formatting
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bug
Package: gv
Version: 1:3.6.2-4
Severity: minor
I've also been using the following patch to build the 3.6.2-4 source
package on various flavors of Debian and Ubuntu. The patch fixes the
problem of quilt returning inconsistent error codes depending on the
version of quilt. A few examples:
* with
Sanjoy Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've also been using the following patch to build the 3.6.2-4 source
> package on various flavors of Debian and Ubuntu. The patch fixes the
> problem of quilt returning inconsistent error codes depending on the
> version of quilt. A few examples:
>
>
> Can you re-check the above?
Just did and it was my mistake. An ancient /usr/local/bin/quilt (so
old that the --version option doesn't even work) shadowed
/usr/bin/quilt (0.46-2). Sorry for the false alarm!
-Sanjoy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Package: remstats
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n
Please find attached the dutch po-debconf translation. Please add
it to your next package revision, it should be inserted in your package
build-tree as debian/po/nl.po, TIA.
Feel free to mail me if this file needs updating at some future dat
Package: pdfscreen
Version: 1.5-6
Severity: important
pdfscreen depends on tetex-bin. Could you please make it depend either on
tetex-bin or the corresponding package from texlive?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'),
Sanjoy Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can you re-check the above?
>
> Just did and it was my mistake. An ancient /usr/local/bin/quilt (so
> old that the --version option doesn't even work) shadowed
> /usr/bin/quilt (0.46-2). Sorry for the false alarm!
No problem, we can close this then?
Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2007 08:50:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
9 matches
Mail list logo
