Package: afnix, aleph
Severity: serious
Justification: file conflicts between packages, policy violation
hi,
both afnix and aleph do ship several files of eachother but do not
conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same
environment:
Unpacking aleph (from .../aleph_0.9.0-3
texmacs_1.0.6.9-1_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
texmacs_1.0.6.9-1.dsc
texmacs_1.0.6.9.orig.tar.gz
texmacs_1.0.6.9-1.diff.gz
texmacs-common_1.0.6.9-1_all.deb
texmacs_1.0.6.9-1_sparc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCR
Accepted:
texmacs-common_1.0.6.9-1_all.deb
to pool/main/t/texmacs/texmacs-common_1.0.6.9-1_all.deb
texmacs_1.0.6.9-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/texmacs/texmacs_1.0.6.9-1.diff.gz
texmacs_1.0.6.9-1.dsc
to pool/main/t/texmacs/texmacs_1.0.6.9-1.dsc
texmacs_1.0.6.9-1_sparc.deb
to pool/main/t/texmac
Your message dated Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:33:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#412366: fixed in texmacs 1:1.0.6.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Could I have some advice about the best way to fix this one please? Here's
a summary:
* The obsolete package "aleph" is supserseded by "afnix".
* I've requested the removal of aleph from unstable (bug #389163).
* There is already another RC bug against "aleph", as it conflicts with
tetex-bin.
I d
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:14:42AM -, Paul Cager wrote:
> Could I have some advice about the best way to fix this one please? Here's
> a summary:
>
> * The obsolete package "aleph" is supserseded by "afnix".
> * I've requested the removal of aleph from unstable (bug #389163).
> * There is alre
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Add this to afnix:
>
> Conflicts: aleph
> Replaces: aleph
>
> This should make it possible to have always one of them installed and
> make afnix replace aleph on dist-upgrades.
Isn't
Provides: aleph
also needed?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Sin
Hi there,
I tried this scenario an it also crashes..
But on the console there was also this line:
Could not find 'drkonqi' executable.
So 'rekall' depends on kdebase-bin in which drkonqi is placed.. this
should be corrected.
So do you have 'kdebase-bin' installed and if not, is this
On Thursday 01 March 2007, Simon Effenberg wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I tried this scenario an it also crashes..
>
> But on the console there was also this line:
>
>
> Could not find 'drkonqi' executable.
>
>
> So 'rekall' depends on kdebase-bin in which drkonqi is placed.. this
> should be c
Frank Küster wrote:
> Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Add this to afnix:
>>
>> Conflicts: aleph
>> Replaces: aleph
>>
>> This should make it possible to have always one of them installed and
>> make afnix replace aleph on dist-upgrades.
>
> Isn't
>
> Provides: aleph
>
> also neede
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:14:42AM -, Paul Cager wrote:
> Could I have some advice about the best way to fix this one please? Here's
> a summary:
> * The obsolete package "aleph" is supserseded by "afnix".
> * I've requested the removal of aleph from unstable (bug #389163).
> * There is alread
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:39:50PM -0600, Sebastian P. Luque wrote:
> I choose "store in database" and rekall crashes immediately after choosing
> the type of database, no matter what it is (mysql, postgresql, the two I
> use in my system). I get these message at the terminal (narrowed to what
>
Hi, I hate to be the one to mention this, but people continue to
talk about your weight issue and it just disgusts me. Whether you
know it by now, people are always chattering about each other at
work but you come up more than enough. I wasn't the happiest or
best-fit up until a year ago or s
13 matches
Mail list logo
