Package: aspectj
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: important
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
It is using a build-dependency on j2sdk1.4, which could probably be
replaced by one on sun-java5-jdk. It would allow the
libnids_1.21-0_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libnids_1.21-0.dsc
libnids_1.21.orig.tar.gz
libnids_1.21-0.diff.gz
libnids-dev_1.21-0_i386.deb
libnids1.21_1.21-0_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
libnids-dev_1.21-0_i386.deb
to pool/main/libn/libnids/libnids-dev_1.21-0_i386.deb
(new) libnids1.21_1.21-0_i386.deb optional libs
IP defragmentation TCP segment reassembly library
Libnids is a library that provides the functionality of one of the NIDS
(Network Intrusion Detection System) compon
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 03:33:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395313: fixed in gcc-h8300-hms 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 03:33:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#241837: fixed in gcc-h8300-hms 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 03:33:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273533: fixed in gcc-h8300-hms 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 03:33:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122428: fixed in gcc-h8300-hms 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 03:33:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#138798: fixed in gcc-h8300-hms 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 03:33:11 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358236: fixed in gcc-h8300-hms 4.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:51:05 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 275289 important
Bug#275289: non-intuitive and misserably explained
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hello Luc
Hi
> Eduards comments regarding this package are absolutely true, the package
> is currently one of the meaningless ones we ship :)
>
> But given that it's "optional" and almost all users will already have
> setup their timezone properly using the Debian-Inst
severity 275289 important
stop
On 2006-11-08 Luk Claes wrote:
> > Would you object if I downgrade it back to "important"?
>
> No.
>
Thanks!
bye,
-christian-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 8 Nov 2006 20:52:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Package: gs-gpl fixes this
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsi
Package: python-adns
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
Relevant parts:
running build_ext
building 'adns' ext
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 00 pending
Bug number 00 not found. (Is it archived?)
> tags 326295 pending
Bug#326295: please rebuild with libreadline5-dev as build dependency
Tags were: fixed
Tags added: pending
FYI: The status of the gnump3d source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.9.9.9-1
Current version: 2.9.9.9-2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the kde-style-klearlook source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.9.2-1
Current version: 0.9.9.2-2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more i
FYI: The status of the kwave source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.7.7-1
Current version: 0.7.7-2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
FYI: The status of the wallpaper-tray source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.4.6-3
Current version: 0.4.6-4
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more informatio
python-adns_1.1.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-adns_1.1.0-2.dsc
python-adns_1.1.0-2.diff.gz
python-adns_1.1.0-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Accepted:
python-adns_1.1.0-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/python-adns/python-adns_1.1.0-2.diff.gz
python-adns_1.1.0-2.dsc
to pool/main/p/python-adns/python-adns_1.1.0-2.dsc
python-adns_1.1.0-2_amd64.deb
to pool/main/p/python-adns/python-adns_1.1.0-2_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:17:31 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397706: fixed in python-adns 1.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
23 matches
Mail list logo
