obconf_1.5-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

2006-09-05 Thread Debian Installer
Rejected: obconf_1.5-4_amd64.changes: a file with this name already exists in the Done directory. Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of obconf_1.5-4.dsc. Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of obconf_1.5-4.diff.gz. Rejected: obconf_1.5-4_amd64.deb: old versi

Processing of obconf_1.5-4_amd64.changes

2006-09-05 Thread Archive Administrator
obconf_1.5-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: obconf_1.5-4.dsc obconf_1.5-4.diff.gz obconf_1.5-4_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Bug#385464: marked as done (obconf: does not run with new openbox version)

2006-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:44:02 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line obconf: does not run with new openbox version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

dumpster cooch

2006-09-05 Thread Whitney Gordon
I can redo your M0RETGAGE at a 5% or better r8te. Last 3 I've given below: L. Sykes / Pine Hills, Florida / 1.5 million at 4.1% Y. Lawrence / Omakerk, Nebraska / 200 thousand at 4.4% F. Grove / Houston, Texas / 555 thousand at 3.9% http://ar.geocities.com/kfuherb_rzb/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#245822: marked as done (lopster: could not get server list from napigator)

2006-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:34:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#262522: fixed in lopster 1.2.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#262522: marked as done (New upstream version - 1.2.1)

2006-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:34:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#262522: fixed in lopster 1.2.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#306017: marked as done (lopster: New upstream version - 1.2.2)

2006-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:34:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306017: fixed in lopster 1.2.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#287494: marked as done (lopster: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

2006-09-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 05 Sep 2006 14:34:22 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#287494: fixed in lopster 1.2.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo