Bug#378531: tapiir: FTBFS: missing fltk

2006-07-17 Thread Julien Danjou
Package: tapiir Version: 0.7.1-8 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of tapiir_0.7.1-8 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.48 > Build started at 2006071

Processing of malaga_6.13-8_amd64.changes

2006-07-17 Thread Archive Administrator
malaga_6.13-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: malaga_6.13-8.dsc malaga_6.13-8.diff.gz malaga-bin_6.13-8_amd64.deb libmalaga6_6.13-8_amd64.deb libmalaga-dev_6.13-8_amd64.deb malaga-doc_6.13-8_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -

malaga_6.13-8_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-17 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libmalaga-dev_6.13-8_amd64.deb to pool/main/m/malaga/libmalaga-dev_6.13-8_amd64.deb libmalaga6_6.13-8_amd64.deb to pool/main/m/malaga/libmalaga6_6.13-8_amd64.deb malaga-bin_6.13-8_amd64.deb to pool/main/m/malaga/malaga-bin_6.13-8_amd64.deb malaga-doc_6.13-8_all.deb to pool/main/m

Bug#378304: marked as done (malaga: FTBFS: bashisms)

2006-07-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:47:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#378304: fixed in malaga 6.13-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

falconseye_1.9.3-16_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-07-17 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: falconseye-data_1.9.3-16_all.deb to pool/main/f/falconseye/falconseye-data_1.9.3-16_all.deb falconseye_1.9.3-16.diff.gz to pool/main/f/falconseye/falconseye_1.9.3-16.diff.gz falconseye_1.9.3-16.dsc to pool/main/f/falconseye/falconseye_1.9.3-16.dsc falconseye_1.9.3-16_i386.deb to

Processing of falconseye_1.9.3-16_i386.changes

2006-07-17 Thread Archive Administrator
falconseye_1.9.3-16_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: falconseye_1.9.3-16.dsc falconseye_1.9.3-16.diff.gz falconseye_1.9.3-16_i386.deb falconseye-data_1.9.3-16_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Bug#353552: marked as done (falconseye: Architecture independent files in /usr/lib)

2006-07-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2006 04:02:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353552: fixed in falconseye 1.9.3-16 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#378561: rtf2latex: Output name file differ from input name

2006-07-17 Thread Andrea Ganduglia
Package: rtf2latex Version: 1.0fc2-4 Severity: normal Hi, I used rtf2latex with file named `qui_quo_qua.rtf', but output file was named `qui-quo-qua.tex' (rtf2latex replace '_' with '-'): It'isnt good for bath script. ~$ rtf2latex qui_quo_qua.rtf ~$ ls qui_quo_qua

Bug#378560: Suggests obsolete package, python-orbit

2006-07-17 Thread Loïc Minier
Package: sanduhr Severity: normal Hi, sanduhr Suggests: python-orbit, but this is obsolete and replaced by -pyorbit. Bye, -- System Information: Debian Release: Debian unstable (sid) APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i68

Bug#378610: netcdf: FTBFS: bashisms (probably)

2006-07-17 Thread Julien Danjou
Package: netcdf Version: 3.6.1-0.1 Severity: important Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: > Automatic build of netcdf_3.6.1-0.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.48 > Build started at 2006071

Bug#378647: netcdf-bin: fails to clean up /usr/doc symlink

2006-07-17 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: netcdf-bin Version: 3.6.1-0.1 Severity: normal While I'm glad to see that new installs of netcdf-bin will no longer create an (obsolete) symlink in /usr/doc (per #322837), you should also take care to remove any such symlink when upgrading from older versions. Could you please do so? --

Bug#378650: xruskb: fails to clean up /usr/doc symlink

2006-07-17 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: xruskb Version: 1.15.3-2 Severity: normal While I'm glad to see that new installs of xruskb will no longer create an (obsolete) symlink in /usr/doc, you should also take care to remove any such symlink when upgrading from older versions. Could you please do so? -- System Information: De