Processed: assign to wnpp

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 374437 wnpp Bug#374437: O: phpunit -- Unit testing suite for PHP4 Bug reassigned from package `phpunit' to `wnpp'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (adminis

Bug#308912: marked as done (sawfish: 'Toggle>Ignored' seems irreversible with current user interface)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:51:15 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Procedure to reverse toggle>ignore has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#373866: file hijacking is serious

severity 373865 serious severity 373866 serious severity 375440 serious quit Hello, this bug break installation and upgrade of packages, so I bump the severity. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Processed: file hijacking is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 373865 serious Bug#373865: hebcal: ships /usr/share/info/dir(.old).gz Severity set to `serious' from `important' > severity 373866 serious Bug#373866: sawfish: ships /usr/share/info/dir(.old).gz Severity set to `serious' from `important' > se

Bug#282236: marked as done (pearpc: shift key does not work)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:37:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: reassign yaboot wishlist to yaboot has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processed: Re: OpenBSD can't boot via yaboot on powerpc (no dualboot possible)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 372780 wishlist Bug#372780: OpenBSD can't boot via yaboot on powerpc (no dualboot possible) Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking sy

Bug#300950: marked as done (yaboot: ybin and mkofboot do not support devfs-style device names)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:15:46 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300950: yaboot: ybin and mkofboot do not support devfs-style device names has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: Re: yaboot: doesn't boot from an msdos logical partition and ybin doesn't warn you

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 281525 wishlist Bug#281525: yaboot: doesn't boot from an msdos logical partition and ybin doesn't warn you Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trac

Bug#294081: yaboot: ofpath improperly handles a second sata hard drive.

"Pedro I. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> does not seem to exist anymore. Without further information and if the bug does not appear on my test G5, I will close it. Cheers, -- ((__,-"""-,__)) Aurélien GÉRÔME .---. `--)~ ~(--` Free Software Developer / \ .-'( )`-. Unix Sys

Bug#294081: yaboot: ofpath improperly handles a second sata hard drive.

Hi, Could you both provide me your /proc/cpuinfo and your Apple OF version, please. I will try to reproduce it on a friend's dual G5 too. Cheers, -- ((__,-"""-,__)) Aurélien GÉRÔME .---. `--)~ ~(--` Free Software Developer / \ .-'( )`-. Unix Sys & Net Admin [EMAIL

Bug#281525: yaboot: doesn't boot from an msdos logical partition and ybin doesn't warn you

severity 281525 wishlist thanks On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:42:27PM +0100, Alessandro Amici wrote: > i'm not an expert of powerpc so i might have missed the bit of > information that warns against this limitation of yaboot, but i consider a > bug that ybin doesn't complain about an invalid partitio

Processed: Re: yaboot: ofpath improperly handles a second sata hard drive.

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 294081 patch Bug#294081: yaboot: ofpath improperly handles a second sata hard drive. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admin

Bug#233810: yaboot does not recognizes RAID file systems

On Jun 27, Aurélien GÉRÔME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am really tempted to apply that patch, it seems so trivial, despite I can confirm that I have been using it without any problem on multiple systems for more than two years. > the fact Ethan is very reluctant to do so. :( Ethan just does no

Bug#233810: yaboot does not recognizes RAID file systems

On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:33:19AM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 09:53:16AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > On Feb 20, Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> Please apply this patch. Without it it's not possible to use yaboot on a > > >> system with a mirrored /

Bug#263047: fixed

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gandalf | 1.5-2 | source gandalf-dev | 1.3.2-13 | alpha, ia64 gandalf-dev | 1.5-2 | arm, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc gandalf-doc | 1

Bug#375680: Ubuntu and Fedora patches reviewing

Package: yaboot Severity: wishlist As Sven suggested, I post the current Ubuntu patch against Yaboot, because the URL given in the Debian PTS does *not* seem to work reliably. Ubuntu feedback to Debian really sucks. :( Patches o

Bug#375680: Ubuntu and Fedora patches reviewing

OK, here it is... Hard to get, I got it only after multiple looped tries with wget. :/ Cheers, -- ((__,-"""-,__)) Aurélien GÉRÔME .---. `--)~ ~(--` Free Software Developer / \ .-'( )`-. Unix Sys & Net Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]@./ `~~`@) (@`~~`

Processed: Re: Ubuntu and Fedora patches reviewing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 375680 patch Bug#375680: Ubuntu and Fedora patches reviewing There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#294081: yaboot: ofpath improperly handles a second sata hard drive.

On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 01:04:31PM -0400, Eirik Fuller wrote: > > Could you both provide me your /proc/cpuinfo and your > > Apple OF version, please. > > I run MacOS X most of the time (I haven't gotten Xorg to run my > 2560x1600 display at its rated resolution), so I'd have to shut > down my syst

Bug#375680: Ubuntu and Fedora patches reviewing

On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:19:19PM +0200, Aur??lien G??R??ME wrote: > Package: yaboot > Severity: wishlist > > As Sven suggested, I post the current > Ubuntu patch against Yaboot, because the URL > > given in the Debian PTS does *

Bug#375680: Ubuntu and Fedora patches reviewing

* Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-27 11:10]: > > Ubuntu feedback to Debian really sucks. :( > > This isn't a very constructive comment; it would have been more > appropriate to report this (transient) problem to Ubuntu instead. If you'd send patches to the BTS, as has been suggested b

Bug#363588: marked as done (Spelling mistake in package description)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:57:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gandalf: package removed from unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#372560: marked as done (gandalf: FTBFS: no makefile found)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:57:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gandalf: package removed from unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#318708: marked as done (gandalf: FTBFS on 64 arches: image/io/*_rl.lo: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:57:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gandalf: package removed from unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#334881: marked as done (gandalf-dev: image io headers gandalf/image/io/*.h not in package)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:57:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gandalf: package removed from unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#363596: marked as done (Spelling mistake in package description)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:57:19 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gandalf: package removed from unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: sawfish-lisp-source_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1_all.deb to pool/main/s/sawfish/sawfish-lisp-source_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1_all.deb sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sawfish/sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1.diff.gz sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1.dsc to pool/main/s/sawfish/sawfish_1.3+c

Bug#373866: marked as done (sawfish: ships /usr/share/info/dir(.old).gz)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:05:43 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#373866: fixed in sawfish 1:1.3+cvs20060518-1.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Processing of sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1_i386.changes

sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1.dsc sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1.diff.gz sawfish-lisp-source_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1_all.deb sawfish_1.3+cvs20060518-1.1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue d

Bug#375680: Ubuntu and Fedora patches reviewing

On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 11:10 -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:19:19PM +0200, Aur??lien G??R??ME wrote: > > Package: yaboot > > Severity: wishlist > > > > As Sven suggested, I post the current > > Ubuntu patch against Yaboot, because the URL > >

Bug#375680: Ubuntu and Fedora patches reviewing

On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 20:52 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-27 11:10]: > > > Ubuntu feedback to Debian really sucks. :( > > > > This isn't a very constructive comment; it would have been more > > appropriate to report this (transient) problem to Ubun

Bug#375757: diff for 1:1.3+cvs20060518-1.1 NMU

Package: sawfish Version: 1:1.3+cvs20060518-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my sawfish 1:1.3+cvs20060518-1.1 NMU. diff -u sawfish-1.3+cvs20060518/debian/changelog sawfish-1.3+cvs20060518/debian/changelog --- sawfish-1.3+cvs20060518/debian/changelog +++ sawfish-1.3+cvs

Bug#375772: euler ships no .desktop

Package: euler Version: 1.60.6fix-5 Severity: wishlist Hello. euler currently lacks a .desktop file. A bug was filed against the package in the Ubuntu bugtracker [1] and you can find a .desktop file attached there. It would be nice if this was included in Debian as well. [1] https://launchpad.

Bug#375792: ogle-gui: enable gtk2

Package: ogle-gui Version: 0.9.2-3 Severity: wishlist It'd be nice to see ogle-gui built with gtk2 by default (--enable-gtk2). There doesn't appear to be any ifdef's or special code, just include path and linking library adjustments. Seems to behave the same (no major problems) and looks alot