Bug#335899: marked as done (RFA: lmodern -- scalable PostScript fonts for european character sets)

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:02:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335899: fixed in lmodern 0.99.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#348906: marked as done (lmodern warnings with bullets and cdots)

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:02:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348906: fixed in lmodern 0.99.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#268664: marked as done (dosemu: purge destroys user data)

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:17:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268664: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#307021: marked as done ('man mkfatimage16' typo: "socalled")

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:17:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307021: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#249242: marked as done (dosemu: midid missing)

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:17:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249242: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#332478: marked as done (dosemu: cannot override DOSDRIVE_D environment variable)

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:17:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332478: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#351016: marked as done ('man dosemu' typos: "elsewere", "wether", "singlestep", "programm", etc.)

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:17:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#351016: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#302661: marked as done ('man Xdialog' typos: "functionnalities", "occured", & "omited")

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302661: fixed in xdialog 2.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#306532: marked as done (xdialog: New upstream version)

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306532: fixed in xdialog 2.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#329717: marked as done (Catalan translation)

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329717: fixed in xdialog 2.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#332275: marked as done (xdialog: timebox don't display user time HH:MM:SS)

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332275: fixed in xdialog 2.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#342815: marked as done (Xdialog: syntax error leads to infinite memory allocation loop)

2006-02-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342815: fixed in xdialog 2.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#342815: About problems in kernel 2.4

2006-02-11 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Hi, thanks for fixing this, but did somebody investigate why kernel 2.4 dealt so badly with this segfault, and whether 3.1r2's 2.4 kernels have this fixed? That issue is largely more worrying to me than the previous xdialog's SEGV on 2.6 :/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with