Bug#321586: texi2html images licence

2005-08-10 Thread Patrice Dumas
> Personally, I feel that this could be better: > * Just use GPL in Debian for these images (solve problem immediately). > * Work out what programs use texi2html with the images (I do not > believe very many do). These images are not to be automatically used, they are there only for the conven

Bug#321586: texi2html images licence

2005-08-10 Thread Nigel Jones
On 10/08/05, Patrice Dumas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Personally, I feel that this could be better: > > * Just use GPL in Debian for these images (solve problem immediately). > > * Work out what programs use texi2html with the images (I do not > > believe very many do). > > These images ar

Bug#322306: bbpager fails to start under blackbox and fluxbox (possibly others)

2005-08-10 Thread Juha Jäykkä
Package: bbpager Version: 0.3.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Bbpager is unusable since the following happens all the time: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:44:46 ~> bbpager Could not open blackbox style file Cannot connect to window manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10:45:03 ~> (Note

Bug#322391: rxvt: non-POSIX in debian/rules

2005-08-10 Thread Tommy Pettersson
Package: rxvt Version: 1:2.6.4-7 Severity: minor Tags: patch I get a FTBFS on my system because I have dash as standard shell instead of bash. Here's a simple patch that makes the offending line in debian/rules POSIX compliant. diff -rN -u old-rxvt/debian/rules new-rxvt/debian/rules --- old-rxv

Processing of rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1_i386.changes

2005-08-10 Thread Archive Administrator
rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1.dsc rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1.diff.gz rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Processing of rxvt_2.6.4-8_i386.changes

2005-08-10 Thread Archive Administrator
rxvt_2.6.4-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rxvt_2.6.4-8.dsc rxvt_2.6.4-8.diff.gz rxvt_2.6.4-8_i386.deb rxvt-ml_2.6.4-8_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-10 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rxvt-beta/rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1.diff.gz rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1.dsc to pool/main/r/rxvt-beta/rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1.dsc rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rxvt-beta/rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org

rxvt-beta override disparity

2005-08-10 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1_i386.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the pa

Re: rxvt-beta override disparity

2005-08-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 08:17:07AM -0700, Debian Installer wrote: > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the > override file for the following file(s): > > rxvt-beta_2.7.10-1_i386.deb: package says priority is extra, override says > optional. I think the package right

rxvt_2.6.4-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-08-10 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: rxvt-ml_2.6.4-8_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rxvt/rxvt-ml_2.6.4-8_i386.deb rxvt_2.6.4-8.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rxvt/rxvt_2.6.4-8.diff.gz rxvt_2.6.4-8.dsc to pool/main/r/rxvt/rxvt_2.6.4-8.dsc rxvt_2.6.4-8_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rxvt/rxvt_2.6.4-8_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-cha

Processed: retitle 299146 to O: phpwiki -- an informal collaborative website manager, bug 299146 has no owner

2005-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.4 > # correct title > retitle 299146 O: phpwiki -- an informal collaborative website manager Bug#299146: O: phpwiki: an informal collaborative website manager Changed Bug title. > noowne

Bug#208670: marked as done (efax segm faults when sending faxes)

2005-08-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:17:38 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line efax segm faults when sending faxes has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#151566: # 1 HOME BASED PROGRAM

2005-08-10 Thread Janie
Hello Carmella , Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone calls? I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for this program. Give Us A Call 800-671-9012 polaris costa pounce myopia planetesimal discussant fatigue needl