Và1iUM ClÀLIS VlAGGRÀ

Hello, How would you like to save on your pílIs?   VALLíUM CIALLíS VlAGRÀ and many other.   Save over 70% with Medicatiions-By-Mail SHOP.   Have a nice day.         his way out of that trap to the open sea beyond lay clear, the fo could not guess that the men he had beheld in those piraguas w

eBay Pharmacy

Why are online drugs popular http://jvxa.ebh7ixept6em0fe.nbsprmsb.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308485: Log for successful build of battfink_0.5-3 (dist=unstable)

Package: battfink Version: 0.5-3 On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 14:43 +0100, Debian/IA64 non-US Build Daemon wrote: > Function `ORBIT_STUB_GetServant' implicitly converted to pointer at > GNOME_Battfink-stubs.c:22 This is likely caused by a missing prototype/include, and will potentially cause a segfault

Processed: Please do not blindly tag bugs "sid"

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 302282 -sid Bug#302282: gtk-engines-mac2_1.0.3-2(mipsel/unstable): configure built with broken libtool.m4 Tags were: sid Tags removed: sid > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system a

Bug#302282: Please do not blindly tag bugs "sid"

tags 302282 -sid thanks Hi Steve, it was nice if you wouldn't blindly tag bugs sid without doing some minimal checking. If this bug exists in sid, it obviously also exists in sarge. If not, please explain why you disagree. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked

Bug#302282: Please do not blindly tag bugs "sid"

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:18:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > it was nice if you wouldn't blindly tag bugs sid without doing some > minimal checking. > If this bug exists in sid, it obviously also exists in sarge. > If not, please explain why you disagree. The "minimal checking" I did was to n