Bug#268496: marked as done (3dwm-server: Incorrect use of "it's" in package description)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#241112: marked as done (Please remove distributed-net-pproxy.)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#162529: marked as done (asd4-clients: Missing manpages (and docs) )

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:47:33 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line asd4 removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#162528: marked as done (asd4: No manpages or any other docs )

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:47:33 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line asd4 removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#134599: marked as done (distributed-net-pproxy: closes listening sockets after some days running)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#108507: marked as done (some sounds get played with doubled speed)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:47:33 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line asd4 removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#145410: marked as done (distributed-net-pproxy: /etc/init.d/distributed-net-pproxy doesn't work properly)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#163468: marked as done (distributed-net-pproxy: start-stop-daemon changed syntax, --chuid is needed to change user)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#161590: marked as done (distributed-net-pproxy cannot execute binary file on Debian-Sparc)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#169230: marked as done (3dwm-geoclient: Manpage is a shame)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#178463: marked as done (/var/lib/distributed-net-pproxy/ owned by nobody )

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#181473: marked as done (distributed-net-pproxy: New version of pproxy available - needed for rc5-72 clients)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:55:40 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line distributed-net-pproxy removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#202539: marked as done (beaver: New GTK2 Upstream available)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:50:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#217664: marked as done (new version available)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#221472: marked as done (libcelsius-dev: Spelling error in extended description)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#222796: marked as done (Description does not tell what HAWHAW is)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:59:21 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#228442: marked as done (3dwm-server: wrong dependency - omniorb4-nameserver (server) should replace omniorb4 (client))

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#252733: marked as done (hawhaw: New upstream releases available)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:58:57 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#265448: marked as done (3dwm: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: `Math::tolerance' cannot appear in a constant-expression)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#285069: marked as done (aegis3: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'gettime_lex' follows non-static declaration)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:50:36 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#277213: marked as done (package description typo(s) and the like)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:47:55 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#277216: marked as done (package description typo(s) and the like)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#271381: marked as done (typo in description: s/compatiility/compatibility/)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#280306: marked as done (asd4: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-3.4): parse error before '}' token)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:47:33 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line asd4 removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#296732: marked as done (3dwm: FTBFS: Fails to detect OpenGL)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:46:38 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 3dwm removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Experience Multiple Orgasm's!

2005-03-16 Thread Errol Shields
Title: secure xx conflagration yi ebullient xkf women ier 20 minutes is all it takes more info here... crimp uhz nitrous dz policemen km hendrick nc barr grc stegosaurus nuy generosity zcu roach iir backboard gxe deck zd mary wu mechanist isu cal zkm breeches shx gabon quw cynic fdx brow mj

Bug#240546: marked as done (libapache-asp-perl: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable)

2005-03-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:09:16 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line libapache-asp-perl: can't fulfill the recommends in unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#299869: ttf-thryomanes: some derived latin characters (fi ligature for ex.) do not match appearance of ascii chars in italic

2005-03-16 Thread Henry House
Package: ttf-thryomanes Version: 1:1.1-1 Severity: normal The appearance of Ä (dotless i, unicode 0x0131), ï (fi ligature, 0xFB01), and ï (fl ligature, 0xFB02) do not match the appearance of the regular ascii i, f, and l in the italic font. The regular italic F has a flourish that protrudes below