Processing of freewrl_1.07-1_i386.changes

2005-02-16 Thread Archive Administrator
freewrl_1.07-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freewrl_1.07-1.dsc freewrl_1.07-1.diff.gz freewrl_1.07-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

freewrl_1.07-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: freewrl_1.07-1.diff.gz to pool/main/f/freewrl/freewrl_1.07-1.diff.gz freewrl_1.07-1.dsc to pool/main/f/freewrl/freewrl_1.07-1.dsc freewrl_1.07-1_i386.deb to pool/main/f/freewrl/freewrl_1.07-1_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 272815 286145

Bug#277044: marked as done ("--restrict-read-only /" should permit subpaths)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#277044: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#270715: marked as done (bug report)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#270715: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#256266: marked as done (typo in error message)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#256266: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#274326: marked as done (rdiff-backup crashes on recursive backups even when desination is excluded)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#235875: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#225485: marked as done (rdiff-backup --calculate-average is broken)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#225471: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#225471: marked as done (rdiff-backup --calculate-average is broken)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#225471: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#235875: marked as done (rdiff-backup: AttributeError occurs when backup target is subdir of source)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#235875: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#241906: marked as done (rdiff-backup --calculate-average broken)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#225471: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#252960: marked as done (rdiff-backup: needs other version on debhelper build-dep)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#252960: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#260018: marked as done (rdiff-backup: target hard-link test is incorrect for AFS)

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#260018: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: Merging bugs

2005-02-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Severity 295575 serious Bug#295575: evolution: woody2 disables SSL Severity set to `serious'. > Severity 295248 serious Bug#295248: tex4ht: interested in providing a patch for the upgrade Severity set to `serious'. > merge 295248 295575 Bug#295248: t