Heyyy Darling

2005-02-12 Thread mailAccount.com
Wanted to interest you in keeping me some company. My idiot Husband works night shifts, which makes me very lonely at night. To contact me please go here: http://www.dohernow.com/d/1.php Sincerely Yours, Megan b

Bug#245647: Any chance to get the improved man page included?

2005-02-12 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello, any chance that this bug receives a new upload to fix it? (Given that it is a trivial man page extension). Thanks Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg signed mail preferred 64bit GNU powered http://

Bug#239469: Xfce4-goodies packages

2005-02-12 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi Rudy, *, On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:52:15PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > > Rudy did you actually want to adopt these packages?[0] They need a bit of > > whipping into shape so they can ship with sarge and someone really needs > > to do this. It's j

Bug#244276: Bug#294459: HTML manual generated by a broken tex4ht install

2005-02-12 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
> This sounds like a bug in tex4ht, right? I can't alter that package > to fix this file and make that build-depends from within the darcs > package. I think that tex4ht is orphaned in Debian? Maybe I could > try to do an NMU... tex4ht is indeed orphaned; I've added the corresponding WNPP O: bu

A member at our website is attempting to find information about - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2005-02-12 Thread Experience Request Alert2
Opinion Alert Urgent - A member at our website is sharing experiences and opinions about you at our website. -- To examine requests about you use this link - http://9.dirt7.info/lx.php?a=search&b=5&[EMAIL PROTECTED] ### ATTENTION

Bug#239469: Xfce4-goodies packages

2005-02-12 Thread Rudy Godoy
On 12/02/2005 at 17:38 Michael Ablassmeier wrote... > hi Rudy, *, Hi, > I've updated xfce4-diskperf-plugin to the latest upstream version, > changelog looks like this: > > xfce4-diskperf-plugin (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* QA Upload >* New upstream version (Closes: #254400) >

Processing of metamail_2.7-47_i386.changes

2005-02-12 Thread Archive Administrator
metamail_2.7-47_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: metamail_2.7-47.dsc metamail_2.7-47.diff.gz metamail_2.7-47_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Bug#285914: marked as done (metamail: 8-bit encoding is supported by metamail but not by metasend script)

2005-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:02:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285914: fixed in metamail 2.7-47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#245647: marked as done (metamail: Add/Improve SEE ALSO section for splitmail/mimeit)

2005-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:02:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245647: fixed in metamail 2.7-47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#184410: marked as done (metamail: debug message "pre access" left in released version)

2005-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:02:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#184410: fixed in metamail 2.7-47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#249823: marked as done (metamail: additional option when handling unrecognized content types)

2005-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:02:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#249823: fixed in metamail 2.7-47 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

metamail_2.7-47_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-02-12 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: metamail_2.7-47.diff.gz to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-47.diff.gz metamail_2.7-47.dsc to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-47.dsc metamail_2.7-47_i386.deb to pool/main/m/metamail/metamail_2.7-47_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 184410

Bug#239469: Xfce4-goodies packages

2005-02-12 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi Rudy, On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 06:28:05PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: > > I've updated xfce4-diskperf-plugin to the latest upstream version, > > changelog looks like this: > > > > xfce4-diskperf-plugin (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low > > . > >* QA

Processed: reassign 294972 to liblockfile-simple-perl

2005-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 294972 liblockfile-simple-perl Bug#294972: Locking fails with lots of perl warnings under low diskspace Bug reassigned from package `debmirror' to `liblockfile-simple-perl'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: reassign 294972 to liblockfile-simple-perl,

2005-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 294972 liblockfile-simple-perl, Bug#294972: Locking fails with lots of perl warnings under low diskspace Bug reassigned from package `liblockfile-simple-perl' to `liblockfile-simple-perl,'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please