Processing of gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.changes

gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gfslicer_1.5.4-4.dsc gfslicer_1.5.4-4.diff.gz gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#289464: webmin-core: Scheduled Cron Jobs doesn't show nothing

Package: webmin-core Version: 0.94-7woody3 Severity: important Login as root, click "System" tab and then click "Scheduled Cron Jobs" icon. Nothing happens. At first time I think it was not showing the debian default schedules, but I created one for root and still not working. Nothing appears u

Bug#289322: marked as done (gfslicer: Please remove Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev')

Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 06:17:14 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289322: fixed in gfslicer 1.5.4-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gfslicer_1.5.4-4.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gfslicer/gfslicer_1.5.4-4.diff.gz gfslicer_1.5.4-4.dsc to pool/main/g/gfslicer/gfslicer_1.5.4-4.dsc gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gfslicer/gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs:

gfslicer override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): gfslicer_1.5.4-4_i386.deb: package says section is utils, override says gnome. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package w

Processing of xsok_1.02-13_i386.changes

xsok_1.02-13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xsok_1.02-13.dsc xsok_1.02-13.diff.gz xsok_1.02-13_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#287994: marked as done (xsok: chown uses . not :)

Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 07:17:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#287994: fixed in xsok 1.02-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

xsok_1.02-13_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: xsok_1.02-13.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xsok/xsok_1.02-13.diff.gz xsok_1.02-13.dsc to pool/main/x/xsok/xsok_1.02-13.dsc xsok_1.02-13_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xsok/xsok_1.02-13_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 287994 Thank you for your contrib

Bug#121201: Hey, It's me, MayTDQ86621 from MSN

Check here if your message above does not load. When all think alike, no one is thinking very much. -Walter Lippmann (1889-1974) axophyte Ashley disliked reading between the two buildings. birle Don't say you don't have enough time. You have exactly the same number of hours per day that wer

Bug#289485: gupsc: Please remove the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev'

Package: gupsc Severity: wishlist Tags: patch The attached patch removes the Build-Depends on 'libdb3-dev' from debian/control. The package builds fine without it. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gupsc-0.3.1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/gupsc-0.3.1/debian/control

Bug#289512: [l10n] Initial Czech translation of xbanner debconf messages

Package: xbanner Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, patch Hi, in attachement there is initial Czech translation (cs.po) of xbanner debconf messages, please include it. -- Miroslav Kure # #Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext #documentation is worth reading, especi

Processing of obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.changes

obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: obexftp_0.10.6-2.dsc obexftp_0.10.6-2.diff.gz obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.deb libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#285581: marked as done (Cannot connect to a Siemens S55)

Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285581: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#285580: marked as done (Manpage problems)

Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285580: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#261328: marked as done (obexftp: Add support for identifying current Sony-Ericsson phones)

Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#261328: fixed in obexftp 0.10.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/obexftp/libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb obexftp_0.10.6-2.diff.gz to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-2.diff.gz obexftp_0.10.6-2.dsc to pool/main/o/obexftp/obexftp_0.10.6-2.dsc obexftp_0.10.6-2_i386.deb to pool/main/o/obexftp/obex

obexftp override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libobexftp-dev_0.10.6-2_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and th

Bug#289518: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: obexftp override disparity]

Package: libobexftp-dev - Forwarded message from Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: obexftp override disparity Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:47:34 -0500

Bug#251252: obexftp: Looks like the patch is applied but insufficiently

Package: obexftp Version: 0.10.6-1 Followup-For: Bug #251252 Hi. I had a look at the sources and it looks like the patch was mostly applied (probably in the original source, or as a result of an alread included debian patch) in the current 0.10.6-1 version. Anyway, this won't work on my T610.

Bug#251252: upstream bug filed

Hi. For the records, I filed a bug upstream in : http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1099051&group_id=8960&atid=108960 The patch is also in http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1099008&group_id=8960&atid=308960 Regards, -- Olivier BERGER (OpenPGP: 1024D/

Bug#232796: marked as done (Half-broken dependency on emacs20)

Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:48:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#232796: fixed in t-gnus 6.17.2.00-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#245826: marked as done (t-gnus: please maintain and update the package)

Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:48:04 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#245826: fixed in t-gnus 6.17.2.00-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now