Processed: Re: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied

2004-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 282264 - unreproducible Bug#282264: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied Tags were: unreproducible Tags removed: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#282264: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied

2004-12-03 Thread Andreas Metzler
tags 282264 - unreproducible thanks On 2004-11-27 Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tags 282264 + unreproducible > thanks > Re: Kurt Roeckx in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The package is failing to build with the following error: > > # Add here commands to compile the package. > > cd Unix &&

Processing of rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.changes

2004-12-03 Thread Archive Administrator
rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.dsc rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.diff.gz rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-12-03 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rtf2latex/rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.diff.gz rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.dsc to pool/main/r/rtf2latex/rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4.dsc rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rtf2latex/rtf2latex_1.0fc2-4_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org

Bug#282264: marked as done (rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied)

2004-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 03 Dec 2004 05:47:25 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#282264: fixed in rtf2latex 1.0fc2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#282264: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied

2004-12-03 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Andreas Metzler in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > configure.in is newer than configure and will therefore be thought to > be out of date by make. > > I'll prepare a QA upload to fix this. I have a package ready at http://www.df7cb.de/debian/qa/rtf2latex/ that needs a sponsor :) > PS: BTW Christoph, t

Bug#282264: rtf2latex: FTBFS: rtf2latex-1.0fc2/Unix/missing: Permission denied

2004-12-03 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: To Andreas Metzler in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have a package ready at http://www.df7cb.de/debian/qa/rtf2latex/ that > needs a sponsor :) Ok, you were faster... :) Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/

Bug#220429: We have a lot of new version and this could be updated.

2004-12-03 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, I'm interested to have this package up-to-date and if you don't have time I can do a NMU for it. What you think about? -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID:

Bug#220429: We have a lot of new version and this could be updated.

2004-12-03 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 04:24:06PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello, > > I'm interested to have this package up-to-date and if you don't have > time I can do a NMU for it. > > What you think about? The package is orphaned. Maybe you want to adopt it? ;) Of course you can also only do a QA u