Processing of libofx_0.6.6-2.1_i386.changes

2004-09-29 Thread Archive Administrator
libofx_0.6.6-2.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libofx_0.6.6-2.1.dsc libofx_0.6.6-2.1.diff.gz libofx0c102_0.6.6-2.1_i386.deb libofx-dev_0.6.6-2.1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#273421: marked as done (Invalid Maintainer: field)

2004-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:47:12 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#273421: fixed in libofx 0.6.6-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

libofx_0.6.6-2.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-09-29 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libofx-dev_0.6.6-2.1_i386.deb to pool/main/libo/libofx/libofx-dev_0.6.6-2.1_i386.deb libofx0c102_0.6.6-2.1_i386.deb to pool/main/libo/libofx/libofx0c102_0.6.6-2.1_i386.deb libofx_0.6.6-2.1.diff.gz to pool/main/libo/libofx/libofx_0.6.6-2.1.diff.gz libofx_0.6.6-2.1.dsc to pool/main

Bug#273421: fixed in libofx 0.6.6-2.1

2004-09-29 Thread Stephen Quinney
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 01:11:47PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > A QA-maintained (orphaned) package can never be a NMU, it is always a 'QA > upload', and should not have a '-2.1' type version number, but simply '-3'. > > This is evidenced by the fact your upload still closed the bug (an

Bug#273421: fixed in libofx 0.6.6-2.1

2004-09-29 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:47:12AM -0400, Stephen Quinney wrote: > Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:41:45 +0100 > Source: libofx > Binary: libofx0c102 libofx-dev > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 0.6.6-2.1 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: high > Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ch