Bug#272426: is non-free

I just asked for this package to be removed, see Bug#254330 for details. Wouter, thanks for reporting. --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

To Cameron's Shop Customers!

Dear customer! We updated our software catalogue and added new popular products! Now you can get any software item at 90% discount rate! For more information visit us here: http://www.bestoem.info/?turbojet With best regards, Product Manager Tara Magee

Bug#261408: webmin-dhcpd: Not resolved

Package: webmin-dhcpd Version: 1.160-1 Followup-For: Bug #261408 I am seeing the same bug. James -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versio

Bug#238927: marked as done (New upstream available)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:02:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#238927: fixed in opendb 0.62p9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#219615: marked as done (Why cannot opendb use capabilities of apache2?)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:02:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#219615: fixed in opendb 0.62p9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#234747: marked as done (opendb: Please switch to gettext-based debconf templates)

Your message dated Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:02:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#234747: fixed in opendb 0.62p9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 272427 -1 -2 -3 -4 Bug#272427: no need to name files .pl in /usr/bin Bug 272427 cloned as bugs 272605-272608. > reassign -1 drsync Bug#272605: no need to name files .pl in /usr/bin Bug reassigned from package `bbdb' to `drsync'. > reassign -2 ab

Bug#272549: rsync.pl.1.gz: add rsync(1) to SEE ALSO

Package: drsync Version: 0.4-1 Severity: minor File: /usr/share/man/man1/drsync.pl.1.gz Add 'rsync(1)' to a SEE ALSO section. Also in rsync made the majority of the work, so rsync is required in both sides of the synchronization. drsync is required only in the caller side. s/made/do

Complete

pbckdg xhozvojg rjbjnv fvylzwwnb kgexoic abniicgiq cvcaskau? vafmj ogpjoudrs Dear Participant, Recently you filled out a information request form regarding your home mor t gage   l o an. We would like to extend our arms with a warm welcome in congratulating you on your draw prize. mogxs hakkhi

Bug#272548: drsync: assumes second argument is a directory

Package: drsync Version: 0.4-1 Severity: minor Here we see that a local test that would work with plain rsync, $ date>a; rsync a b doesn't work with drsync: $ date>a; drsync.pl --state-file=c a b sh: line 1: cd: b: No such file or directory Executing: rsync --update --existing --rsh=rsh a b It