snacc_1.3bbn-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
snacc_1.3bbn-6.dsc
snacc_1.3bbn-6.diff.gz
snacc-doc_1.3bbn-6_all.deb
snacc_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb
libsnacc-dev_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb
libsnacc-dbg_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb
libsnacc0_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 06:17:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#249740: fixed in snacc 1.3bbn-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libsnacc-dbg_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says
libdevel.
libsnacc-dev_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says
libdevel.
Either the p
Accepted:
libsnacc-dbg_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/snacc/libsnacc-dbg_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb
libsnacc-dev_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/snacc/libsnacc-dev_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb
libsnacc0_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/snacc/libsnacc0_1.3bbn-6_i386.deb
snacc-doc_1.3bbn-6_all.deb
to pool/ma
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:32:05 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174032: fixed in splay 0.9.5.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229998: fixed in spong 2.7.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229966: fixed in spong 2.7.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229965: fixed in spong 2.7.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#229934: fixed in spong 2.7.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:47:53 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#245972: fixed in spong 2.7.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
ucbmpeg_1r2-10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ucbmpeg_1r2-10.dsc
ucbmpeg_1r2-10.diff.gz
ucbmpeg_1r2-10_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
ucbmpeg_1r2-10.diff.gz
to pool/non-free/u/ucbmpeg/ucbmpeg_1r2-10.diff.gz
ucbmpeg_1r2-10.dsc
to pool/non-free/u/ucbmpeg/ucbmpeg_1r2-10.dsc
ucbmpeg_1r2-10_i386.deb
to pool/non-free/u/ucbmpeg/ucbmpeg_1r2-10_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 265968 !
Bug#265968: rdiff-backup: Can't restore incremental backups
Owner recorded as Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:25:41 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Inproper command?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 253057 !
Bug#253057: rdiff-backup: reports unchanged files as changed
Owner recorded as Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Your message dated Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:37:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Housekeeping
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo
Hi Marc,
Thanks for reporting.
Two questions for you. First, have the timestamps or permissions on
these files changed? I don't think they would in the course of normal
system usage, but we may as well cover all our bases. Secondly, is
there anything interesting about the increment diff files?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 253057 +moreinfo
Bug#253057: rdiff-backup: reports unchanged files as changed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> owner 206252 !
Bug#206252: rdiff-backup: won't follow symlinked toplevel directories
Owner recorded as Alec Berryman <[EMA
Hi Alec,
You were right.
Thanks for graciously and concisely solving my
problem.
Perhaps rdiff-backup should emit a more
descriptive error message.
Cheers,
Kingsley
--
begin quotation of Kingsley G. Morse Jr. on 2004-08-16 15:21:11 -0700:
> Perhaps rdiff-backup should emit a more descriptive error message.
It could on a number of points, not just on this particular one. I'll
look in to adding more descriptive error messages.
signature.asc
Description: Digit
Hello,
This bug has been fixed upstream by compiling gnucash against
GtkHTML-1.1
see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84707#c11
--
Gordon Heydon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
21 matches
Mail list logo
