inveterate blackguard of a

2004-07-19 Thread Marla Haywood
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 05:26:12 -0600 CLIENT#: 636-768-6047 Hello: You must complete our form to finalize the process. Our company can offer a r~ate of 3.35 % at this moment. We appreciate your business and look forward to following up with you. Please visit our secure site. http://www.turyhgntsk.

Bug#259618: marked as forwarded (ppxp: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)

2004-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:22:33 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #259618, regarding ppxp: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If

Bug#259618: marked as done (ppxp: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)

2004-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:02:46 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#259618: fixed in ppxp 0.2001080415-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#242988: marked as done (Package: python-simpy new release)

2004-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:47:11 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#242988: fixed in python-simpy 1.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#259123: marked as done (python-simpy: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on python)

2004-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:47:11 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#259123: fixed in python-simpy 1.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#252003: marked as done (Package: python-simpy new release)

2004-07-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:47:11 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#252003: fixed in python-simpy 1.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Processing of ppxp_0.2001080415-9_i386.changes

2004-07-19 Thread Archive Administrator
ppxp_0.2001080415-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ppxp_0.2001080415-9.dsc ppxp_0.2001080415-9.diff.gz ppxp_0.2001080415-9_i386.deb ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-9_i386.deb ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-9_i386.deb ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-9_i386.deb Greetings,

ppxp_0.2001080415-9_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-07-19 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-9_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-9_i386.deb ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-9_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-9_i386.deb ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-9_i386.deb to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-9_i386.deb ppxp_0.2001080415-9.

Processing of python-simpy_1.4.2-1_i386.changes

2004-07-19 Thread Archive Administrator
python-simpy_1.4.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-simpy_1.4.2-1.dsc python-simpy_1.4.2.orig.tar.gz python-simpy_1.4.2-1.diff.gz python-simpy_1.4.2-1_all.deb python2.3-simpy_1.4.2-1_all.deb python2.3-simpy-gui_1.4.2-1_all.deb Greetings,

python-simpy_1.4.2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-07-19 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: python-simpy_1.4.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/python-simpy/python-simpy_1.4.2-1.diff.gz python-simpy_1.4.2-1.dsc to pool/main/p/python-simpy/python-simpy_1.4.2-1.dsc python-simpy_1.4.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/p/python-simpy/python-simpy_1.4.2-1_all.deb python-simpy_1.4.2.orig.tar.gz

Bug#256846: nedit segfaults when resizing window

2004-07-19 Thread Alexandre Pineau
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:28:15 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott) wrote: > I do not think I should have multiple versions of the source > headers unless the packages are bad, but this still does not explain the > problem I am seeing with the distribution package. No, it doesn't explain it. The dist

%PART4

2004-07-19 Thread Doc Campos
Don't lose hope man! Joy Shock. Pills that turn your small oneĀ…BIG ON SALE: http://www.herbalmagicsite.com/big.html