Bug#226780: crm114: cannot read the program file

2004-01-08 Thread Francesco Potorti`
Package: crm114 Version: 2002-11-26-2 Severity: grave I get this: bash-2.05b$ crm114 /usr/share/crm114/procmailfilter.crm *** FATAL ERROR *** Couldn't open the file: /usr/share/crm114/procmailfilter.crm Sorry, but I can't recover from that. Bye. (this happened at line 0 of file /usr/

Processing of roleplaying_2.0-10_i386.changes

2004-01-08 Thread Archive Administrator
roleplaying_2.0-10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: roleplaying_2.0-10.dsc roleplaying_2.0-10.diff.gz roleplaying_2.0-10_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

roleplaying_2.0-10_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-01-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: roleplaying_2.0-10.diff.gz to pool/main/r/roleplaying/roleplaying_2.0-10.diff.gz roleplaying_2.0-10.dsc to pool/main/r/roleplaying/roleplaying_2.0-10.dsc roleplaying_2.0-10_i386.deb to pool/main/r/roleplaying/roleplaying_2.0-10_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debi

Bug#226711: [PATCH] fix off-by-one-line behavior in example bot after saving

2004-01-08 Thread Drew Scott Daniels
> --- /usr/share/doc/megahal/examples/Hal.pm 2000-09-01 13:36:58.0 > -0400 > +++ Hal.pm 2004-01-07 16:04:26.0 -0500 > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ > # Save brain. > sub save { > $wselect->can_write(); > - syswrite(WRITE,"#save\n\n",8); > + syswrite(WRITE,"#quie

Bug#226711: [PATCH] fix off-by-one-line behavior in example bot after saving

2004-01-08 Thread Laurent Fousse
Hi, Le Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:09:50PM -0500, Matt Behrens écrivait: > Package: megahal > Version: 9.0.3-7 > > When the example bot saves, megahal says something random. That > appears to stick in the buffer and the bot begins responding not > to the current query but the query immediately befor

Processing of xwave_0.6+2-9_i386.changes

2004-01-08 Thread Archive Administrator
xwave_0.6+2-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xwave_0.6+2-9.dsc xwave_0.6+2-9.diff.gz xwave_0.6+2-9_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

xwave_0.6+2-9_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-01-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: xwave_0.6+2-9.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xwave/xwave_0.6+2-9.diff.gz xwave_0.6+2-9.dsc to pool/main/x/xwave/xwave_0.6+2-9.dsc xwave_0.6+2-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xwave/xwave_0.6+2-9_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 170005 Thank you for you

Bug#170005: marked as done (xwave: FTBFS: Obsolete Build-Depends on libxaw-dev)

2004-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 08 Jan 2004 19:02:22 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#170005: fixed in xwave 0.6+2-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: Processed: libxaw-dev is long gone

2004-01-08 Thread Philip Brown
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:26:33PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:14:54AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Why is a pure virtual build-depends a serious bug? > > Could you please point out the section of policy? > > Forget the pure virtual bit - nothing in unstable provide